Question about Firefox's seeming lack of dependencies

Puppy related raves and general interest that doesn't fit anywhere else
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Flash
Official Dog Handler
Posts: 13071
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 16:04
Location: Arizona USA

Question about Firefox's seeming lack of dependencies

#1 Post by Flash »

As per Lobster's post, Mozilla, Firefox, Thunderbird, etc., experience few or no problems with dependencies when installing them in practically any version of Linux, including Puppy. They are all fairly large programs. Are they large partly because they include everything they need to run as stand-alone programs, or is there some other reason they seem to have no dependencies?

User avatar
Bancobusto
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 20:52
Location: Vancouver Island

#2 Post by Bancobusto »

[/quote]Firefox Dependencies
Required

GTK+-2.6.7, libIDL-0.8.5 and Zip-2.31[/quote]

taken from here http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/vi ... refox.html

So, apparrently it does require something at least...

I was kinda wondering the same thing, wishing that there were more big comlex programs that installed so easy! :cry:

Post Reply