Page 1 of 1
firefox-2.0.0.13.pet *firefox and flash*
Posted: Wed 02 Apr 2008, 02:20
by big_bass
The latest stable non BETA
http://www.ttuuxxx.com/bigbass/firefox-2.0.0.13.pet
md5sum /root/firefox-2.0.0.13.pet
fa0654c451b1bd52acb8e7526407f481 /root/firefox-2.0.0.13.pet
I added these
libstdc++.so.5 this point to the seven instead of the six
libstdc++.so.5.0.7
and flash
big_bass
Posted: Thu 03 Apr 2008, 10:33
by Botanic
and... flash working ?
i never could get flash 9 to work
Posted: Thu 03 Apr 2008, 14:17
by big_bass
Botanic wrote:and... flash working ?
i never could get flash 9 to work
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/
for me yes now its your turn to try
big_bass
Posted: Fri 04 Apr 2008, 20:37
by Botanic
works for me too !
first thing after checking on adobe website i went on youtube and
http://edition.cnn.com/video/
works great. at least i can enjoy compatibility with flash 9.
COOL DOTPET !!! thanks a lot
Posted: Sat 05 Apr 2008, 08:24
by Botanic
@big_bass
suggestion: the plugins in /root/.mozilla/plugins can be replaced with symlinks to /firefox/flugins (saves a lot of space... i was wondering if the trick to have flash 9 working is put flashplayer.xpt in /root/.mozilla - the way you did?)
also, isn't libstdc++.so.5 already in the distribution? as a matter of fact, i moved /firefox in /usr/local, result, at next boot i couldn't start X because of broken link libstdc++.so.5 in /usr/lib ...
Posted: Thu 24 Apr 2008, 15:50
by big_bass
Botanic wrote:@big_bass
suggestion: the plugins in /root/.mozilla/plugins can be replaced with symlinks to /firefox/flugins (saves a lot of space... i was wondering if the trick to have flash 9 working is put flashplayer.xpt in /root/.mozilla - the way you did?)
also, isn't libstdc++.so.5 already in the distribution? as a matter of fact, i moved /firefox in /usr/local, result, at next boot i couldn't start X because of broken link libstdc++.so.5 in /usr/lib ...
yes the libstdc++.so.5 is there but points to the 6 so ..I left it there just in case but you could remove it ?
the added lib was libstdc++.so.5.07 also you need that one too
maybe the symlinks would work fine like you said above I read somewhere not to use the symlinks so I didn't. I'll try and look for the link again with that info
found it ......
# warn libflashplayer.so is a symbolic link
warn_symbolic_link () {
echo ""
echo "WARNING: The $PRODUCT binary is a symbolic link."
echo " The installer will replace this symbolic link with the actual binary."
echo ""
}
P.S thanks for taking the time to write and poking around in the program
keeps me on my toes
big_bass