The time now is Tue 21 May 2013, 02:41
All times are UTC - 4 |
|
Page 1 of 3 [31 Posts] |
Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next |
| Author |
Message |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Tue 29 Jul 2008, 23:16 Post subject:
Alpha 5 of Puppy 4.1 Subject description: go to 'Bugs' section for more info - this is JUST AN ANNOUNCEMENT |
|
Alpha 5 of Puppy 4.1 for testers
http://tmxxine.com/wik/wikka.php?wakka=PuppyDingo41
Click on Alpha 5 it takes you here
Index of /pub/linux/distributions/puppylinux/test/puppy-4.1alpha5
download this file:
puppy-4.0.5-seamonkey.iso
NB: For testing and developers - not for general usage wait for the Beta releases for that
_________________ Puppy WIKI
Last edited by Lobster on Fri 01 Aug 2008, 06:06; edited 2 times in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sit Heel Speak

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2595 Location: downwind
|
Posted: Wed 30 Jul 2008, 05:06 Post subject:
|
|
Where's the zdrv for it?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BarryK
Puppy Master

Joined: 09 May 2005 Posts: 6855 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Wed 30 Jul 2008, 08:09 Post subject:
|
|
There is no zdrv. This pup is built with all modules in the pup_405.sfs file. That's how it will be from now on, or in the initrd.
_________________ http://bkhome.org/blog2/
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Wed 30 Jul 2008, 11:15 Post subject:
size and boot time |
|
Yes, a new approach to booting in 4.1. I just wonder how small size can be achieved in succeeding boots in the same machine. Puppy is not really a hard-disk-bound distro, so it needs to be light after shedding off some unneeded drivers (for repeated use in the same machine).
Say, if I have 3 different PCs, can I boot one after another and expect Puppy to create a hardware profile, then I can rebuild/trim theinitrd.gz (or sfs) based on this profile?
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BarryK
Puppy Master

Joined: 09 May 2005 Posts: 6855 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Wed 30 Jul 2008, 21:47 Post subject:
Re: size and boot time |
|
| raffy wrote: | Yes, a new approach to booting in 4.1. I just wonder how small size can be achieved in succeeding boots in the same machine. Puppy is not really a hard-disk-bound distro, so it needs to be light after shedding off some unneeded drivers (for repeated use in the same machine).
Say, if I have 3 different PCs, can I boot one after another and expect Puppy to create a hardware profile, then I can rebuild/trim theinitrd.gz (or sfs) based on this profile? |
In theory, yes.
_________________ http://bkhome.org/blog2/
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
otropogo
Guest
|
Posted: Wed 30 Jul 2008, 22:52 Post subject:
Re: Alpha 5 of Puppy 4.1 released Subject description: cutting edge Puppy Alpha released by Barry |
|
So where is it? When I go to the URL the page says "alpha 4", and the iso is alpha 4, not alpha 5.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lobster
Official Crustacean

Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 15109 Location: Paradox Realm
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008, 01:58 Post subject:
|
|
When you click on Alpha 5 it takes you here
Index of /pub/linux/distributions/puppylinux/test/puppy-4.1alpha5
download this file
puppy-4.0.5-seamonkey.iso 29-Jul-2008 21:00 92M
_________________ Puppy WIKI
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
otropogo
Guest
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008, 16:23 Post subject:
|
|
| Lobster wrote: | When you click on Alpha 5 it takes you here
Index of /pub/linux/distributions/puppylinux/test/puppy-4.1alpha5
download this file
puppy-4.0.5-seamonkey.iso 29-Jul-2008 21:00 92M |
Jeesh! Why not just post the link or the URL to the download page?
distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/puppylinux/test/puppy-4.1alpha5/
(my apologies to other would be downloaders, although I tried for at least ten minutes, I can't figure out how to create a URL link on this system - you'll have to copy and paste)
Not being on the right wavelength, I clicked on:
"Where do I find out about the Alpha Release?
* Forum thread∞
* Developers Blog∞
* The iso's are available here"
Pretty dumb eh? Looking for the latest alpha release in the alpha release directory. I had the silly idea that all alphas are experimental and recommemded for testers only.
Maybe we need a new label, like "pre-alpha" or "proto-alpha"!.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sit Heel Speak

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2595 Location: downwind
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008, 17:05 Post subject:
|
|
I am delighted to report that 4.1-alpha-5, with the scsi-1 kernel for my Adaptec scsi adapter, assigns drives their letters in what I recognize as "correct" order, speaking as a Gentoo user. That is, sda is the first true scsi drive, then after the scsi drives are done the ata drives get their letters, and finally the removeable usb stick.
Display order in PMount is still not quite right though.
Screen capture
They should be displayed in PMount in correct sort order as:
sda --> the Quantum Atlas V 9 WLS scsi drive with 3 partitions
sdb --> the Quantum Atlas V 9 WLS scsi drive with 2 partitions
sdc --> the Quantum Atlas V 18 WLS scsi drive with 2 partitions
sdd --> the WDC WD102BA ATA drive with 3 partitions
sde --> the Samsung SV4002H ATA drive with 3 partitions
Now to see if a full install to an scsi drive will boot...
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
edoc

Joined: 07 Aug 2005 Posts: 3937 Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008, 17:28 Post subject:
|
|
Is this ready to test on my Panasonic Toughbook CF-28 where I have been struggling with USB and PCMCIA?
Or is the work on that part, which I have read about elsewhere in Puppy-land, still underway?
_________________ Thanks! David
Home page: http://nevils-station.com
Don't google Search! http://duckduckgo.com
Multiple computers - currently running Puppy Exprimo ver. 5x15
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sit Heel Speak

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2595 Location: downwind
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008, 18:20 Post subject:
|
|
I am thrilled to report that booting the full install on sda2 (first scsi drive, 2nd partition)...with BIOS setup boot order told to boot the first ata disk first...i.e. from grub menu.lst on the first ata drive (sdd1)...works. However, Grub's conventions as to how drives are numbered are a bit puzzling. First ata drive is hd0, as you would expect, but second ata drive is hd5, which is doubly strange since there are only five drives present and so you would think the numbering would top out at hd4. First scsi drive is hd1.
(note: when installing, choose "Internal (IDE or SATA) hard drive" as the media that you want to install Puppy to, even though it's really an SCSI hard drive)
Now let's see if I can make it boot this full install from a grub menu.lst residing on the same scsi drive as the Puppy 4.1-alpha-5 Puppy full install...with BIOS setup told to boot the first scsi drive first, and the adapter's own BIOS told to allow it...
Last edited by Sit Heel Speak on Thu 31 Jul 2008, 22:59; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sit Heel Speak

Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 2595 Location: downwind
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008, 20:17 Post subject:
|
|
I am dancing on popcorn clouds buttered with sunshine to report that...
The Age of Puppy Linux Booting Natively On SCSI has finally arrived.
If in BIOS Setup I make the first scsi disk the first boot device...grub installed to the first scsi disk's mbr (installing to the root superblock didn't work)...grub installed to /dev/sda (i.e. menu.lst on sda1)...the actual full install to which the menu.lst entry points, can be on any scsi disk with a Linux partition. When booting with scsi disk as the first boot device, unlike in the above test, the boot disk is (in the grub menu lines) hd0.
I won't test it, but would presume that a frugal install on scsi can be started this way too.
***Allelujah!!!***
And now, suddenly I have enough disk space to go test a few more puplets...
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Sage
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Posts: 4622 Location: GB
|
Posted: Fri 01 Aug 2008, 01:15 Post subject:
|
|
Genius lurks in many, but few are able to unlock it!
Well done. Would be a good idea to revisit norte3's thread and provide some additional detail. Somewhere, I outlined some of the aspects of setting up the drive jumpers, etc on scsi kit.
Any comments on access speed?
Incidentally, this thread is becoming confused with the bugs thread again.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
raffy
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 4636 Location: Manila
|
Posted: Fri 01 Aug 2008, 04:57 Post subject:
features like how the Puppy sfs is used (simply mounted) |
|
Sage: | Quote: | | this thread is becoming confused with the bugs thread |
So maybe add "features" to the title, to make this a discussion of 4.1alpha5 features.
I guess that with flash devices now in wide usage, that Puppy can be flash-device centric (in contrast to being CD-centric). Maybe these points will help clarify:
- Using a live CD (in a single-CD PC) and not wanting to touch the hard disk, Puppy has to load itself to RAM so that the CD drive can be used. This increases the RAM requirement, and at times causes an embarrassing crippled Puppy (when the available RAM gets exhausted). Copying the sfs to RAM also lengthens the boot time.
- Flash devices can function as virtual hard disk, especially in USB2-equipped PCs. In fact, experience in the eeePC shows that the external SD/USB/flash interface can be faster than the inbuilt flash storage.
In alpha5, Unipup's (4.1's) design is to include all drivers (?) in the Puppy sfs, and I noted that the boot device is always mounted regardless of RAM size (my tests did not go over 512 MB RAM). However, performance is still snappy in 600-800 mhz Celerons.
Of course, for people who may want to use smaller sfs (with cutdown drivers or less applications), the remastering tool is always available.
_________________ Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
otropogo
Guest
|
Posted: Fri 01 Aug 2008, 23:57 Post subject:
Re: features like how the Puppy sfs is used (simply mounted) |
|
| raffy wrote: | Sage: | Quote: | | this thread is becoming confused with the bugs thread |
So maybe add "features" to the title, to make this a discussion of 4.1alpha5 features. |
IMO It doesn't make much sense to talk exclusively about new features when so many old "features" don't work reliably, (or at all).
| raffy wrote: | I guess that with flash devices now in wide usage, that Puppy can be flash-device centric (in contrast to being CD-centric). Maybe these points will help clarify:
- Using a live CD (in a single-CD PC) and not wanting to touch the hard disk, Puppy has to load itself to RAM so that the CD drive can be used. This increases the RAM requirement, and at times causes an embarrassing crippled Puppy (when the available RAM gets exhausted). Copying the sfs to RAM also lengthens the boot time. |
There are other, arguably more important, reasons for loading Puppy entirely into RAM, AND for keeping that minimum RAM requirement small, than freeing up the CD/DVD drive.
1. support for machines with limited RAM, particularly older laptops
2. speed of operation
3. battery life on laptops
As system requirements increase, more experienced users will see less and less reason to stay with Puppy instead of switching to more mainstream distributions, such as Xubuntu. And with them will go much of the support for the beginners.
And how significant a factor is any potential shortening of boot-up time in the greater scheme of things? I mean, what fraction of your daily Puppy time will be saved by any conceivable shortening of boot-up?
| raffy wrote: | | - Flash devices can function as virtual hard disk, especially in USB2-equipped PCs. ..... |
Especially?? How many potential Puppy users do you think will have internal (non-USB) flash drives? And the other question is: how long will those flash cards last when being written to constantly like a mechanical drive?
And unless I've missed some recent announcement, booting from pcmcia-based flash (or network, or scsi),even with a floppy boot disk, is still just a fond wish in Puppy land.
| raffy wrote: | | Of course, for people who may want to use smaller sfs (with cutdown drivers or less applications), the remastering tool is always available. |
So you take a distro distinguished by its ease of use for beginners and by its ability to run reasonably well on trailing edge systems low on speed, memory, and storage.
Then you gear it towards the power users equipped with significantly greater hardware resources and vastly greater computing skills, and tell the beginners with their minimal machines to "roll your own" (and on what, I wonder, since they probably won't be able to boot Puppy in the first place?).
What's left? Just another unremarkable nerdy distro in a field of dozens..
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 3 [31 Posts] |
Goto page: 1, 2, 3 Next |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|