Puppy 4.2 "Deep Thought" - Bugs & Fixes

Message

#211 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 05:26

Hey WhoDo rember I mentioned way back that Barry's Cups issue was libgnomecups and libgnomeprint related, well a funny thing happened, While I was compiling the gtk2.12.1 for pizzasgood I had an error, it was libgnomeprintui-2-2 just wondering what is that? is that another gnomeprint some has given you and you mixed them up, because when I built libgnomeprint-2-2 it didn't have the "UI" at the end, does that stand for unicode? If so that could be a issue because none of the other Cups related are compiled as unicode, so I reinstalled the full libgnomeprint I compiled the firstime and This time it compiled without error. So below is the the libgnomeprint that should be installed by default. Its the full version with the devs included. Its also a part of the gtk so it really should be replaced now.
ttuuxxx

DaveS · #212 Post by **DaveS** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 05:30

Ttuuxxx, I would expect ui to stand for 'user interface', that is the normal convention, with uni for Unicode?

#213 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 05:39

http://www.puppylinux.asia/tpp/ttuuxxx/ ... 1-full.pet

Here's the gtk, I removed the 18MB worth of doc's and stripped the 4 main libs saving 1MB. Thats it. So basically its full, just remove the needed dev's for the compiler since it does make a cups plugin, which could also relate to printing issues, since we never upgrade gtk after we upgraded cups, which we should I guess since it makes a plugin based on the cups system installed.
ttuuxxx

#214 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 05:43

Wow it does make a difference, I don't even have a printer installed and look at how many options I have, I never had the Samba and few others before, I think someone better take notes about gtk and cups.
ttuuxxx

#215 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 05:54

DaveS wrote:Ttuuxxx, I would expect ui to stand for 'user interface', that is the normal convention, with uni for Unicode?

Hi Well its strange then because look at the images below, one is the default pet and one is the usr/lib directory, plus it wouldn't compile until I installed the full version including dev's.
the usr/lib has the UI from where? Its the only Cups related file with that numbering. It had to come from a libgnomeprint package, but it isn't included in the one I released, well not in file backup section of my hard drive.
ttuuxxx
and yes usually uni is for unicode

#216 Post by **Pizzasgood** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 06:19

Cool. I'll test it tomorrow (my first real final is tomorrow, so I need to go to bed now).

It would be easier on WhoDo if you used the new2dir program to automatically make both the plain and the _DEV packages from the get-go. I've been pretty spotty about doing that myself, but I'm trying to improve and become more "proper".

#217 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 06:25

Pizzasgood wrote:Cool. I'll test it tomorrow (my first real final is tomorrow, so I need to go to bed now).

It would be easier on WhoDo if you used the new2dir program to automatically make both the plain and the _DEV packages from the get-go. I've been pretty spotty about doing that myself, but I'm trying to improve and become more "proper".

I usually divide them up myself, Hmmm does it do that? hell all I ever do is type i386 when I compile as i386 and lightning speed hit enter like 5 times and never actually read the scripts, lol maybe I should. lol
ttuuxxx

#218 Post by **Pizzasgood** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 06:41

Yeah. There's a stage where it stops and lets you type in a comma separated list including EXE,DEV,DOC,NLS and it will automatically make separate packages for each one (EXE is the normal one, and the package it makes won't have any suffix. The others will have a _DEV, _DOC, or _NLS suffix between package name and version number).

WhoDo: Did you get that email I sent out a while back about the inconsistencies between the Unleashed packages and the 4.2 ISO?

#219 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 06:59

Pizzasgood wrote: WhoDo: Did you get that email I sent out a while back about the inconsistencies between the Unleashed packages and the 4.2 ISO?

Barry had a note on his blog that he had to rename some of them, due to improper naming , could that be it?
ttuuxxx

WhoDo · #220 Post by **WhoDo** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 08:05

ttuuxxx wrote:While I was compiling the gtk2.12.1 for pizzasgood I had an error, it was libgnomeprintui-2-2 just wondering what is that? is that another gnomeprint some has given you and you mixed them up, because when I built libgnomeprint-2-2 it didn't have the "UI" at the end, does that stand for unicode? If so that could be a issue because none of the other Cups related are compiled as unicode, so I reinstalled the full libgnomeprint I compiled the firstime and This time it compiled without error. So below is the the libgnomeprint that should be installed by default. Its the full version with the devs included. Its also a part of the gtk so it really should be replaced now.

Both libgnomeprint-2.18.5 and libgnomeprintui-2.18.2 are "on" in 4.2 and 4.2.1, ttuuxxx. I originally left the "ui" (user interface) library out and the Puppy build threw it up as a missing dependency, so I had to put it back.

So what you're telling me is that I can replace both libgnomeprint-2.18.5 and libgnomeprintui-2.18.2 with the libgnomeprint-2.18.5 now supplied? If that's the case then we should rename that to avoid overwriting the previous version in pet_packages_4 at ibiblio.org too.

WhoDo · #221 Post by **WhoDo** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 08:12

Pizzasgood wrote:WhoDo: Did you get that email I sent out a while back about the inconsistencies between the Unleashed packages and the 4.2 ISO?

Yes, PG, I did. I just haven't finished dealing with them so I haven't yet replied. I found and removed the _DEV files from the working packages, so I will need to upload the new copies of the pets to overwrite the ones that included those. I can't remember the other stuff, but I have been working on it. I'm online in 4.2.1 now, but my email is back in my 4.12 install. I'll revisit and reply later. Good luck with the exam!

WhoDo · #222 Post by **WhoDo** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 08:15

ttuuxxx wrote:
Pizzasgood wrote: WhoDo: Did you get that email I sent out a while back about the inconsistencies between the Unleashed packages and the 4.2 ISO?
Barry had a note on his blog that he had to rename some of them, due to improper naming , could that be it?
ttuuxxx

No, Jeff, that's another issue and I've handled that one as well. Instead of uploading new copies I've followed Barry's convention and renamed the packages in my Unleashed tree as well as using Barry's corrected packages.txt as the base. Those issues should have been resolved now. The issue of supplying multiple versions of a package with the same name is ongoing. That's why I suggested renaming libgnomeprint-2.18.5 with a ttuuxxx-specific version number to avoid overwriting the older one.

#223 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 08:53

Naa if it said you needed both then keep them both, and maybe use the newer one and rename it

did you want me to separate the gtk package for you? main, dev, locales files ?
ttuuxxx

WhoDo · #224 Post by **WhoDo** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 08:57

ttuuxxx wrote:Naa if it said you needed both then keep them both, and maybe use the newer one and rename it
did you want me to separate the gtk package for you? main, dev, locales files ?

Yes, please. It makes things easier when I have to build pets for uploading to ibiblio.org after.

#225 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 09:06

Also my system is clean right now, Do you have any package request before for I go compiling crazy WhoDo <--- WhoDo only Guys

for the distro?
ttuuxxx

#226 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 10:30

ok WhoDo, I made it easier for you, lock and load baby.

http://www.puppylinux.asia/tpp/ttuuxxx/ ... 1-i386.pet

http://www.puppylinux.asia/tpp/ttuuxxx/ ... 1-i386.pet

http://www.puppylinux.asia/tpp/ttuuxxx/ ... 1-i386.pet

http://www.puppylinux.asia/tpp/ttuuxxx/ ... 1-i386.pet

enjoy
ttuuxxx

#227 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 11:34

Well since you didn't reply about the free packages offer WhoDo, I guess its ok to start compiling other things once again

ttuuxxx

Master_wrong · #228 Post by **Master_wrong** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 13:50

I hate to say this but... more abiword bug...

copying from seamonkey into abiword can create mess if there is table or special character etc.

#229 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 14:15

Master_wrong wrote:I hate to say this but... more abiword bug...

copying from seamonkey into abiword can create mess if there is table or special character etc.

You had to say it didn't you

I'll see what I can do.
ttuuxxx

#230 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Mon 27 Apr 2009, 14:34

Master_wrong wrote:I hate to say this but... more abiword bug...

copying from seamonkey into abiword can create mess if there is table or special character etc.

Ok I just tried it on puppies 4.2 and luckily thats the base I'm using, because I don't have that issue

But 4.2.1 does, so lets narrow down the differences, they both have the abiword update, This one has the recompiled gtk2 and I think that version has a similar patch. This one doesn't have Pwidgets, hmm thats It it must be Pwidgets, better get rid of the quick WhoDo, lol Just kidding guys. Wait a minute I didn't ask which version is he using? the Broken abiword in 4.2 or the fixed version in 4.2.1?

Master Wrong which version of puppy are you using?
ttuuxxx

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

Puppy 4.2 "Deep Thought" - Bugs & Fixes