PET MAKER - 2.3 - Oct 2014
- gposil
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon 06 Apr 2009, 10:00
- Location: Stanthorpe (The Granite Belt), QLD, Australia
- Contact:
Why re-invent the wheel
What Trio has done was going to be a tool in the Developers IDE ...if Trio doesn't mind I will include a subset of his project. as Tool menu choice
[img]http://gposil.netne.net/images/tlp80.gif[/img] [url=http://www.dpup.org][b]Dpup Home[/b][/url]
Re: Why re-invent the wheel
Well, off course I won't mind, please continue..gposil wrote:What Trio has done was going to be a tool in the Developers IDE .. if Trio doesn't mind I will include a subset of his project. as Tool menu choice
Hello bro
Just a request, if possible. Can you build in an option to add the whole folder at once? I petted up a theme for Pmusic but it had about 30 files! Too slow!
Nice job though
Cheers
Just a request, if possible. Can you build in an option to add the whole folder at once? I petted up a theme for Pmusic but it had about 30 files! Too slow!
Nice job though
Cheers
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
trio wrote:Bro
Already has that functiom. Install latest version, v 06, from main page
Cheers
Ahhhh ....ok!
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
espeak in .pet package
Today I've just learned how to compile in linux. It was ages I wanted espeak on puppy linux, but I couldn't find it anywhere. So I decided to do it myself. But without Trio's application I couldn't have shared it. Thanks to his work now I made a .pet of espeak in a flash! The version of espeak is 1.40.02.
by the way if anybody is interested in espeak .pet package here it is. It also need portaudiov19 package, which I've already found on this forum, but that I also upload here.
I compiled it with puppy 4.2.
by the way if anybody is interested in espeak .pet package here it is. It also need portaudiov19 package, which I've already found on this forum, but that I also upload here.
I compiled it with puppy 4.2.
- Attachments
-
- portaudio-v19-i486.pet
- (59.96 KiB) Downloaded 1357 times
Last edited by ariel on Sat 04 Jul 2009, 10:53, edited 1 time in total.
Ahh dang! You beat me to it! Great idea!trio wrote:Hi all,
I am thinking to integrate new function, that is a SFS-maker (dir2sfs) and change the dir2pet func to technosaurus's dump2pet (no verbose, straight to make pet). What do you all think? Thanks
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
Don't worry, I got the PM... twice! Must be the forum doing it's thing... you knowtrio wrote:Hi bro,
I can't reply your pm, dunno why. Anyway, I am waiting for result of 3 interviews, so, my fingers crossed. And yes, that was my real pic your wify saw...
I will upgrade pet maker soon when I have free time, just want to get few opinions first
Thanks for asking bro
Back on topic.. SFS maker is a great idea. Maybe add dump2pet? Thoughts any body?
Puppy Linux Blog - contact me for access
Re: espeak in .pet package
Puppy user "muggins" has been creating and updating dotpets of espeak for some years now. You'll find it here:ariel wrote:It was ages I wanted espeak on puppy linux, but I couldn't find it anywhere. So I decided to do it myself.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 55&t=25046
Your dotpet is significantly larger in size than muggin's one, so I'm wondering if you remembered to strip the binaries?
github mcewanw
- moogsydodong
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon 16 Mar 2009, 10:35
- Location: Tagum City, Davao del Norte, Mindanao, Philippines
Re: espeak in .pet package
If I had seen the pet was already out there I wouldn't have done another onemcewanw wrote:Puppy user "muggins" has been creating and updating dotpets of espeak for some years now. You'll find it here:ariel wrote:It was ages I wanted espeak on puppy linux, but I couldn't find it anywhere. So I decided to do it myself.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 55&t=25046
Your dotpet is significantly larger in size than muggin's one, so I'm wondering if you remembered to strip the binaries?
you're right I didn't strip the binaries. I just compiled in the easiest possible way, which is not the most economical in terms of memory usage.
anyway, trio's idea of a .pet/sfs maker is very interesting. in this way puppy is going to be easier to use day by day.
Given that the "standard" puppy only allows 3 sfs files to be loaded in, it would be nice to be able to convert an sfs file to a pet filetrio wrote:feedback anybody?
By doing that, one could easily uninstall the pet version, thus offering the flexability that the puppy derivatives with large number of sfs files offer.
Thom