Classic Pup 2.14X -- Updated 2 series
- ttuuxxx
- Posts: 11171
- Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
- Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
- Contact:
Here's the latest netsurf browser, took a bit of compiling time and altering the usr/include/gtk2 files about 20 of them.
enjoy
ttuuxxx
enjoy
ttuuxxx
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)
All of a sudden, I could no longer connect via WPA wireless with any of the 214X's I tried. Other puppies had no problem. Far from being an expert, it took me a bunch of time trying to figure things out. The network wizard was unable to make the WPA connection. I tried tempestuous's excellent HOWTO on making manual wifi connections (including adding cryptograhic modules, with no success) http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=22469 and further verified that wpa_supplicant was the point of failure.
To make a long story short, it seems I had changed the router to use AES encryption instead of TKIP. I changed it to TKIP and all is well now.
Perhaps this is an opportunity to improve 214X; some people have not be able to use 214X wirelessly, possibly for the same reason as I had. Is it possible to compile wpa_supplicant such that it supports both AES and TKIP, or change configuration files? Other puppies seem to be happy with either AES or TKIP. Sorry I don't know enough to take this further.
HTH,
Jon
To make a long story short, it seems I had changed the router to use AES encryption instead of TKIP. I changed it to TKIP and all is well now.
Perhaps this is an opportunity to improve 214X; some people have not be able to use 214X wirelessly, possibly for the same reason as I had. Is it possible to compile wpa_supplicant such that it supports both AES and TKIP, or change configuration files? Other puppies seem to be happy with either AES or TKIP. Sorry I don't know enough to take this further.
HTH,
Jon
Hi John,JonT wrote: To make a long story short, it seems I had changed the router to use AES encryption instead of TKIP. I changed it to TKIP and all is well now.
Perhaps this is an opportunity to improve 214X; some people have not be able to use 214X wirelessly, possibly for the same reason as I had. Is it possible to compile wpa_supplicant such that it supports both AES and TKIP, or change configuration files? Other puppies seem to be happy with either AES or TKIP. Sorry I don't know enough to take this further.
HTH,
Jon
That´s a nice feature request,
I think we need some guide from Thempestous to be able to add it.
Regards
Thanks clarf for the support for the idea; I think I have found the beginnings of a answer.
Nothing more scary than ignorance in action. I was preparing to take a stab at recompiling wpa_supplicant (scary), but it turns out that's not necessary.
Searching for information on wpa_supplicant.conf (one reference here) indicates the lines in that file starting with "pairwise" and "group" typically default to
The default has only TKIP. I won't be using WEP so I left off the last two, and can now connect to my router in either AES or TKIP.
Someone more knowledgeable than I (not hard) should specify a conf file to fit most people.
Linux can be so logical; TKIP for TKIP and CCMP for AES. Love it.
Nothing more scary than ignorance in action. I was preparing to take a stab at recompiling wpa_supplicant (scary), but it turns out that's not necessary.
Searching for information on wpa_supplicant.conf (one reference here) indicates the lines in that file starting with "pairwise" and "group" typically default to
Code: Select all
pairwise=CCMP TKIP
group=CCMP TKIP WEP104 WEP40
Someone more knowledgeable than I (not hard) should specify a conf file to fit most people.
Linux can be so logical; TKIP for TKIP and CCMP for AES. Love it.
-
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: Fri 10 Jun 2005, 05:12
- Location: Australia
Yes, that's 100% correct ... but the Network Wizard in 214X already accommodates both forms of WPA encryption.JonT wrote:The default has only TKIP. I won't be using WEP so I left off the last two, and can now connect to my router in either AES or TKIP.Code: Select all
pairwise=CCMP TKIP group=CCMP TKIP WEP104 WEP40
I suspect that in the course of your investigation and diagnosis, and then the discovery that your encryption mode had changed at the router, that you may have become confused.
The "default" wpa_supplicant configuration file you refer to in 214X is /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf
and yes, it's been set up for WPA (TKIP) encryption ... only.
But there's a second configuration file - /etc/wpa_supplicant2.conf
which has been set up for WPA2 (AES / CCMP) encryption. This configuration file is referenced by the Network Wizard when you select the "WPA2" button. Refer netwiz-gui.jpg
But while investigating this I discovered that the "AP Scan" labels in the Network Wizard gui are unhelpful. So I have modifed the gui, and posted the improved version in the "Extra drivers for Puppy 2 with 2.6.18.1 kernel" thread -
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 858#573858
- Attachments
-
- netwiz-gui.jpg
- (59.06 KiB) Downloaded 1960 times
- ttuuxxx
- Posts: 11171
- Joined: Sat 05 May 2007, 10:00
- Location: Ontario Canada,Sydney Australia
- Contact:
here's a number lock app, just install it and restart X, I tossed it into the startup folder so it will autostart on restarts.
ttuuxxx
ttuuxxx
- Attachments
-
- numlockx-1.2-i386.pet
- (3.08 KiB) Downloaded 362 times
http://audio.online-convert.com/ <-- excellent site
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)
http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/ <-- Codec Test Files
http://html5games.com/ <-- excellent HTML5 games :)
Dear All,
Does virtualbox sfs/pet available for 214X Top9?
which is build on kernel 2.6.18.1.
So that I can run a windows xp guest on puppy 214X host.
Sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak
Does virtualbox sfs/pet available for 214X Top9?
which is build on kernel 2.6.18.1.
So that I can run a windows xp guest on puppy 214X host.
Sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak
[Precise 571 on AMD Athlon XP 2000+ with 512MB RAM]
[Fatdog 720 on Intel Pentium B960 with 4GB RAM]
[url]http://srinivas-nayak.blogspot.com/[/url]
[Fatdog 720 on Intel Pentium B960 with 4GB RAM]
[url]http://srinivas-nayak.blogspot.com/[/url]
Dear All,
I did frugal installation of 214X Top 9 on my machine.
Everything went fine.
Xorg wizard suggested 1024x768x16 resulution for my monitor.
I selected the same.
When I reached desktop, only task bar was displayed. Desktop background image was not displayed and icons were not displayed.
Is there a bug in 214X Top9?
I checked all of the screen resulutions Xorg suggested, but all were having same problem.
Choosing Xvesa, only flickered my screen.
Did anybody have such experience?
Can anybody please help me on this.
My motherboard is having Intel 810 chipset for PIII processor.
Sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak
I did frugal installation of 214X Top 9 on my machine.
Everything went fine.
Xorg wizard suggested 1024x768x16 resulution for my monitor.
I selected the same.
When I reached desktop, only task bar was displayed. Desktop background image was not displayed and icons were not displayed.
Is there a bug in 214X Top9?
I checked all of the screen resulutions Xorg suggested, but all were having same problem.
Choosing Xvesa, only flickered my screen.
Did anybody have such experience?
Can anybody please help me on this.
My motherboard is having Intel 810 chipset for PIII processor.
Sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak
[Precise 571 on AMD Athlon XP 2000+ with 512MB RAM]
[Fatdog 720 on Intel Pentium B960 with 4GB RAM]
[url]http://srinivas-nayak.blogspot.com/[/url]
[Fatdog 720 on Intel Pentium B960 with 4GB RAM]
[url]http://srinivas-nayak.blogspot.com/[/url]
- Colonel Panic
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09
I have to second this. I also have the Intel i810 onboard graphics on my machine and I'm running Top8 now with no problems.James C wrote:For what it's worth, I run Top 9 (actually all of the 214X's since the beginning) mainly on a 733 MHz P3 with the Intel 810 graphics and I've never had a problem with the graphics.Possibly something may be corrupted in your savefile.
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.
snayak write:
When I reached desktop, only task bar was displayed. Desktop background image was not displayed and icons were not displayed.
Is there a bug in 214X Top9?-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In my case when I installed. From the start and the following screen as the taskbar however. / Root / .config / rox.sourceforge.net / ROX so-linking to the / root / Startup the Filer / pb_Default. I fell through it several times but was good. In so far Pb_Default cured.
dropped pb_Default to /root/Startup and restart Xserver
https://sites.google.com/site/tomo37798 ... ects=0&d=1
When I reached desktop, only task bar was displayed. Desktop background image was not displayed and icons were not displayed.
Is there a bug in 214X Top9?-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In my case when I installed. From the start and the following screen as the taskbar however. / Root / .config / rox.sourceforge.net / ROX so-linking to the / root / Startup the Filer / pb_Default. I fell through it several times but was good. In so far Pb_Default cured.
dropped pb_Default to /root/Startup and restart Xserver
https://sites.google.com/site/tomo37798 ... ects=0&d=1
- Colonel Panic
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09
Thanks for this one. I tried it, but unfortunately found it doesn't format pages with pictures very well and there's a lot of text overlap making some words unreadable.ttuuxxx wrote:Here's the latest netsurf browser, took a bit of compiling time and altering the usr/include/gtk2 files about 20 of them.
enjoy
ttuuxxx
I'm posting from an old version of Links-graphic, 2.1 pre18, instead (from when Links still had javascript).
Best,
CP .
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.
- Colonel Panic
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09
Could someone please tell me if there's a way of adding new sets of desktop icons to Top8? I had a quick look at the forum search but there were nearly 1,000 posts to trawl through and I'm afraid I gave up at page 6.
Thanks in advance,
CP .
P.S. I'm very impressed with Top 8 (and I'm sure Top 9 is at least as good). I may have to rethink my view that the 4.20 / 4.21 based Puppies are the best ones.
Thanks in advance,
CP .
P.S. I'm very impressed with Top 8 (and I'm sure Top 9 is at least as good). I may have to rethink my view that the 4.20 / 4.21 based Puppies are the best ones.
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.
I've installed several sets of different icons in Top 9 by simply installing pets.As a test,I just installed this icon pet
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/9/21/ ... onized.pet
from this post.No problems.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 592#532592
Entire thread of pets of icon sets
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 530#212530
HTH.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/9/21/ ... onized.pet
from this post.No problems.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 592#532592
Entire thread of pets of icon sets
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 530#212530
HTH.
- Colonel Panic
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09
Hi,MinHundHettePerro wrote:In 214XRC5 I just made /etc/init.d/hiawatha.run non-executable (right-click - properties - un-tick the three exec-boxes).mama21mama wrote:user to: 214x-Top9
something about hiawhata webserver.
always loads at startup, do not know why.
BootManager this off: s
I see that in 214X-top9 (not running it at the moment, so cannot verify) there are more files involvedI'd suggest to first try if making /etc/rc.d/init.d/hiawatha.run non-executable is enough. If not, I'd continue with making /etc/init.d/rc.hiawatha non-executable. And if hiawatha would still be auto-started, I'd simply delete all three files (provided I'd have no intention of running hiawatha later on).Code: Select all
# ls -go /etc/init.d/*atha* lrwxrwxrwx 1 27 2011-10-10 23:03 hiawatha.run -> ../rc.d/init.d/hiawatha.run -rwxrwxrwx 1 1713 2010-08-22 16:45 rc.hiawatha #
Hope that helps /MHHP
MHHP solution works, although this is a bug that need some changes on 214X to solve this problem. >It works like this:
1. BootManager changes executable properties on "/etc/rc.d/init.d/*" files to enbale or disable any service.
2. "/etc/rc.d/rc.ervices" script executes all files on "/etc/init.d" directory (I think this was designed on this way to make Puppy works like other Linux distros).
3. To make both previous points work and avoid duplicated information, any file in /etc/init.d should be a symlink to an executable service file on /etc/rc.d/init.d/.
In the hiawatha case there are two executable files on /etc/init.d and just one is a symlink that can be controled by BootManager.
The definitve solution for the hiawatha service should be, delete redundant and bigger hiawatha.run file on /etc/init.d/, move the /etc/init.d/rc.hiawatha executable file to /etc/rc.d/init.d/, then make a symlink in /etc/init.d/ pointing to the moved executable file (´ln -s /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc.hiawatha rc.hiawatha´).
There is also needed a small change on Bootmanager, (just to keep the description on the hiawatha service list), line 284:
add an * character before hiwatha, it should be:
*hiawatha*)
Or to avoid this change on Bootmanager, first rename the rc.hiawatha file to hiawatha (or hiawatha.run whatever you like but remember to delete the redunat file first) then move this file and finally create the symlink pointing to it.
That´s all.
Regards,
- Colonel Panic
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09
Update; I've now installed a few icon sets and decided the tok-tok sets are my favourites so far (narrowly, over Buttonized). Here's my desktop, with the tok-tok dark icon set;
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.
ttuuxxx
Just a quick note, as I've just come across trio's sfs converter, which I thought people here might find useful
- convert sfs3>4 and sfs4>3
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?&t=45614
thanks go to SHS for his Opera 12.00 Build 1085 for Puppy 214x-top9, which led me to the link
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=64599
Aitch
Just a quick note, as I've just come across trio's sfs converter, which I thought people here might find useful
- convert sfs3>4 and sfs4>3
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?&t=45614
thanks go to SHS for his Opera 12.00 Build 1085 for Puppy 214x-top9, which led me to the link
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=64599
Aitch
- Colonel Panic
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09
Thanks for this link. I like Opera and am looking forward to trying this (I'm posting from Vector at the moment).
Cheers,
CP .
Cheers,
CP .
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.