Our USA President is neither ignorant nor acting out of ignorance and anyone who has been in Iraq since their liberation knows quite well that the vast majority of Iraqis are delighted to be free of Saddam and his murdeous rapist thug sons.rarsa wrote:It's not easy to ignore your president. He is ignorant and acts based on that. And I didn't see any anti-American propaganda on this thread actually. (hey people, you keep forgeting that America starts at 'tierra del fuego' in Argentina and ends at Canada. America is the name of the Continent, but I won't try to expose ignorance any more, sorry).edoc wrote:[As for the anti-American propaganda, as I say to my children, when people act ignorant ignore them.
By the way, That was my opinion about a game funded by the US army. Noone has rebutted saying that the game and the war are far appart and that you can disasociate the game from the real war. So I get that for the people that like those games, killing the real enemy can realy be fun.
And don't get me wrong, I have nothing against shoot'em all games I don't think they condition people for anything... except when the real purpose is to condition them (aka army funded games).
More hospitals, more schools, more freedom, more free enterprise small business, free and open elections (despite terrorist efforts to intimidate by mnudering people lined up to vote or filed to be candidates for office). These are bad things?
This, below, is anti-United States of America propaganda.
These sorts of claims originate with the enemies of freedom (everyone's except their own) who murdered innocent non-combatants on 911 in NYC, a public subway in Great Britian, public transportation in Spain, and routinely and as a matter of some twisted religious perrogative butcher their fellow Muslims (men, women, and children) on a daily basis.innocent people are dying in greater numbers than under the tyrant dictator.
Is it worse to train our soldiers to defend our freedom using lethal force than for them to train their children to murder innocent non-combatant citizens in public venues by blowing themselves up?
At best the terrorists and their sympathetic mullas are guilty of gross child abuse and neglect -- in civilized societies those who brainwash children to hate in this way would be properly jailed.
And yes, it is incorrect to characterize an interactive training game as bad. There is scant, if any, evidence that separates so-called make-believe games that rehearse killing than Army training tools.
There is also scant, if any, evidence that anyone in the USA military finds pleasure in killing -- all of the TV interviews by known anti-war liberals with returning vets trying to get them to say just that have failed. These men and women went and did a job and they say that they saw endless evidences that the cause was just, that they would return, that the media is mostly covering up the good for partisan reasons, and that they hate war but understand it as an unavoidable necessity.
Had the USA stayed out of WWI and WWII all of Europe would be speaking German under the thumb of viscious dictators.
Why is history so hard for the modern generation to comprehend? As one has said, he who fails to learn from history is doomed to repeat it ... which is why there was a WWII.
BTW: I do not play any video games and carefully screen those our children okay. I hate violent games, including paintball, but understand the need for military training and that others will differ as to the boundaries of free speech and of free access to games with which I disagree.
A proud American (USA) who believes that no more civilized nor peace-
causing, nor non-expansionistic, nor more generous, nor more careful to avoid collateral non-combatant deaths during conflicts (during the past 50 years) super-power nation has ever existed in the history of the world. And I say so without fear of successful contradiction.
Back to the purpose of the list ...
IMHO, YMMV ... doc