Installed it, says it`s ok, load AVI to delay the audio ( copy video and audio ).
The "delay audio" checkbox won`t work so I can`t set the delay amount.
After selecting the input file the main Avidemux window won`t redraw itself...
Don`t know about the x264 and ac3 codecs but Mplayer plays the AVI fine.
Any one have experience with Lucid Puppy`s Avidemux package?
Avidemux in Lucid`s Package Manager doesn`t work.
I use the portable version of Avidmux on Lucid Puppy.
Download is near the bottom on this page:
http://portablelinuxapps.org/
Download is near the bottom on this page:
http://portablelinuxapps.org/
- abushcrafter
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: Fri 30 Oct 2009, 16:57
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: Avidemux in Lucid`s Package Manager doesn`t work.
Try moving the window.sunburnt wrote:After selecting the input file the main Avidemux window won`t redraw itself...
To see the output from Avidemux look for the combo-box which by default has "input" selected, choose "output".
Now do you get your audio delay?
[url=http://www.adobe.com/flashplatform/]adobe flash is rubbish![/url]
My Quote:"Humans are stupid, though some are clever but stupid." http://www.dependent.de/media/audio/mp3/System_Syn_Heres_to_You.zip http://www.systemsyn.com/
My Quote:"Humans are stupid, though some are clever but stupid." http://www.dependent.de/media/audio/mp3/System_Syn_Heres_to_You.zip http://www.systemsyn.com/
Hi abushcrafter; Yes I did move the window and it moved normally,
but the portion that was covered by the file select dialog never redrew.
### NOTE: It occurred to me that Avidemux may have been parsing the input video.
This would make the main window unresponsive, but you`d think it would say something.
stu90; The file you pointed me to was an EXE file according to the ROX file browser.
It didn`t redraw the main window immediately either, but very quickly it did so.
I`m not sure, but it seems the EXE version is faster, but I don`t know if that would make it faster at parsing.
stu90, your file did a great job of editing the audio! But the std. one may have worked also.
I think I may try it for encoding a video, I`ve tried Avidemux for this before and it failed miserably.
### Q... I`ve suggested that SFS files be used for a new app. package format.
( MUCH better than .pet or .tar.gz )
This makes me wonder if an app. and all it`s dependencies can be made into an EXE.
Maybe an even better way to go for a standardized app. package format?
BOTH the SFS file and EXE file package types don`t need to be installed.
No file tracking is needed they can be added and removed with little effort and leftover mess!
but the portion that was covered by the file select dialog never redrew.
### NOTE: It occurred to me that Avidemux may have been parsing the input video.
This would make the main window unresponsive, but you`d think it would say something.
stu90; The file you pointed me to was an EXE file according to the ROX file browser.
It didn`t redraw the main window immediately either, but very quickly it did so.
I`m not sure, but it seems the EXE version is faster, but I don`t know if that would make it faster at parsing.
stu90, your file did a great job of editing the audio! But the std. one may have worked also.
I think I may try it for encoding a video, I`ve tried Avidemux for this before and it failed miserably.
### Q... I`ve suggested that SFS files be used for a new app. package format.
( MUCH better than .pet or .tar.gz )
This makes me wonder if an app. and all it`s dependencies can be made into an EXE.
Maybe an even better way to go for a standardized app. package format?
BOTH the SFS file and EXE file package types don`t need to be installed.
No file tracking is needed they can be added and removed with little effort and leftover mess!