gtk1.2 puppy anyone?
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
I think I got the old Dillo to work fine on x86_64, with musl, libpng and tinyxlib! The fixed sources are here.
Pretty exciting - the last time I used this browser was on DSL 3.x
(screenshot taken under Xubuntu 14.04 x86_64)
EDIT: confirmed to work on another distro. Yep, it works.
Pretty exciting - the last time I used this browser was on DSL 3.x
(screenshot taken under Xubuntu 14.04 x86_64)
EDIT: confirmed to work on another distro. Yep, it works.
- Attachments
-
- dillo.png
- (21 KiB) Downloaded 982 times
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
Here's a screenshot of my "DSLR" (DSL Reboot) pet project
I'm trying to build a 64-bit Puppy very similar to DSL - so far, I have 90% of packages and graphical a package manager. Since it doesn't have any C++ applications, I can't use Fluxbox, so I dressed JWM like 2.14
EDIT: got Ted 2.17 to work as well.
EDIT 2: Siag too.
I'm trying to build a 64-bit Puppy very similar to DSL - so far, I have 90% of packages and graphical a package manager. Since it doesn't have any C++ applications, I can't use Fluxbox, so I dressed JWM like 2.14
EDIT: got Ted 2.17 to work as well.
EDIT 2: Siag too.
- Attachments
-
- 2reborn.png
- (44.99 KiB) Downloaded 515 times
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
- technosaurus
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 01:24
- Location: Blue Springs, MO
- Contact:
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
Here it is. I'm not sure whether this patch has any side-effects.
By the way, I got my 64-bit DSL lookalike to work pretty well. It has tons of applications, a package manager, JWM and the artwork from DSL 3.x. It uses kernel 3.10.x and around 75 MB in size. I need a name for this project - I want to build a website for it and publish a first alpha.
By the way, I got my 64-bit DSL lookalike to work pretty well. It has tons of applications, a package manager, JWM and the artwork from DSL 3.x. It uses kernel 3.10.x and around 75 MB in size. I need a name for this project - I want to build a website for it and publish a first alpha.
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
- technosaurus
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 01:24
- Location: Blue Springs, MO
- Contact:
In the DSL tradition of having an ungoogleable acronym, why not DSLR (Damn Small Linux Reloaded not whatever the hell it means in cameras - you basically get a mirror to see the actual image instead of a sub-pixelated lcd, or a viewing window approximation)Iguleder wrote:I need a name for this project - I want to build a website for it and publish a first alpha.
Check out my [url=https://github.com/technosaurus]github repositories[/url]. I may eventually get around to updating my [url=http://bashismal.blogspot.com]blogspot[/url].
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
Hehe, I like "DSLR". Has DSL's rudeness and funny.
More ideas?
EDIT: here's a teaser, courtesy of my Acer C720P chromebook.
More ideas?
EDIT: here's a teaser, courtesy of my Acer C720P chromebook.
- Attachments
-
- 20140614_233232.png
- (149.85 KiB) Downloaded 717 times
-
- 20140614_233445.png
- (146.98 KiB) Downloaded 931 times
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
DieSeL is a great name, but it's a well-known brand. I want something unique. DSDLS isn't catchy enough, because it has multiple Ds.
So far, I like RDSL the best. It's short and I'm not aware of any product or company called "RDSL".
So far, I like RDSL the best. It's short and I'm not aware of any product or company called "RDSL".
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
- technosaurus
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 01:24
- Location: Blue Springs, MO
- Contact:
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
DSLR it is. I put it in GitHub, in its current, alpha quality form.
It builds perfectly on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64, within 1.5-2 hours on my chromebook. I'll upload a testing image soon - at the moment it's 101 MB, without any kind of trimming (i.e with tons of documentation, static libraries, headers, etc').
It builds perfectly on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64, within 1.5-2 hours on my chromebook. I'll upload a testing image soon - at the moment it's 101 MB, without any kind of trimming (i.e with tons of documentation, static libraries, headers, etc').
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
- technosaurus
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 01:24
- Location: Blue Springs, MO
- Contact:
Any luck building seamonkey 1.1.19-gtk1-static (see lamarelle. org for .config)
It had issues building with glibc, so would be a good test for musl-libc and uclibc++ or ustl.
It had issues building with glibc, so would be a good test for musl-libc and uclibc++ or ustl.
Check out my [url=https://github.com/technosaurus]github repositories[/url]. I may eventually get around to updating my [url=http://bashismal.blogspot.com]blogspot[/url].
- technosaurus
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 01:24
- Location: Blue Springs, MO
- Contact:
I think you can use a --with-system-* flag for it ... just build it as a static lib on the systemIguleder wrote:I was very close to getting Seamonkey to build, but it forces some shared libraries, like libmozjs. I want a single binary without these. Any workaround for this?
I use this one, as it is the last C-only version:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/ ... rc1.tar.gz
Check out my [url=https://github.com/technosaurus]github repositories[/url]. I may eventually get around to updating my [url=http://bashismal.blogspot.com]blogspot[/url].
- Iguleder
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
- Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
- Contact:
Could you provide your building instructions? As far as I can see, both Firefox 1.5.x and Seamonkey 1.1.19 don't have the option to build against a system libjs.
EDIT: I just set up a website for DSLR. At the moment, there's no ready image - you'll have to build it (automatically, of course).
I'm experimenting with cross-compiling a 32-bit variant from the same build environment - I think it would be nice to have a "hybrid" flavor with a 64-bit kernel and 32-bit user mode.
EDIT: I just set up a website for DSLR. At the moment, there's no ready image - you'll have to build it (automatically, of course).
I'm experimenting with cross-compiling a 32-bit variant from the same build environment - I think it would be nice to have a "hybrid" flavor with a 64-bit kernel and 32-bit user mode.
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]
- technosaurus
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008, 01:24
- Location: Blue Springs, MO
- Contact:
umm, yeah forgot about that...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331776
iirc I did get it to build once with some sed trickery on every single makefile ... it was easier than trying to navigate the 2nd most poorly organized source ever.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331776
iirc I did get it to build once with some sed trickery on every single makefile ... it was easier than trying to navigate the 2nd most poorly organized source ever.
Check out my [url=https://github.com/technosaurus]github repositories[/url]. I may eventually get around to updating my [url=http://bashismal.blogspot.com]blogspot[/url].