Page 1 of 11

Wary 0.9.8 (098) feedback

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 01:06
by BarryK
Announcement:

http://bkhome.org/blog/?viewDetailed=01964

Repeating the announcement here:

I think that this will be the last beta -- the next will be an RC (Release Candidate).

Download from here:
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/dis ... /wary-098/

Md5sums:
d377d65d8e02a79857528bd88b17a1f2 wary-096.iso___wary-098.iso.delta
4847e15e1f4714bd66307a8dcfec0734 wary-098.iso
4667b91f106d8ae948f95cdb3bc22939 wary_devx_096.sfs___wary_devx_098.sfs.delta
186f492015f493aa18b503b27dced419 wary_devx_098.sfs


If you are on dialup and already have downloaded Wary 096, good news as the .delta files are only 6.4MB and 1.3MB. If you have Wary 094, you can download the .delta files to upgrade to 096, then to 098.

The last-minute fixes in the unofficial 097 have been important, and 098 is looking good!

Note, this pup has also been built with most-needed modules inside wary_098.sfs, so most people can throw away the zw098114.sfs file.

Feedback most welcome...

Is this really the last beta, or am I being overly optimistic?...
Of course, we don't have to have perfection to consider it release-quality. Some things are going to be on-going long term projects to get right, such as our analog/3G modem setup. So, is this pup close enough to general usability for the next to be an RC?...

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 02:00
by Béèm
hmm, 02:59 am here. Will test tomorrow.

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 02:03
by James C
Fresh manual frugal install of Wary 098 on my main Linux box.

On initial boot there was working internet (wired dsl) and sound "woof-woof" as well as the correct 1440x900 screen resolution.Everything was persistent after a reboot.

Installed the Firefox 3.6.9 pet,rebooted and working fine.

The only little glitch is .....the Video Upgrade Wizard doesn't download the drivers and pops up a message the pet didn't install.Guess I'll just go to the repo... :lol:


VIDEO REPORT: Wary Puppy, version 098

Chip description:
oem: NVidia
product: NV18 () Board Chip Rev A2

Driver used by Xorg:
nv

Video mode used by Xorg:
Resolution: Depth 24 Depth: "Display"

...the above also recorded in /tmp/report-video
#


-Computer-
Processor : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
Memory : 1034MB (114MB used)
Operating System : Puppy Linux 0.09
User Name : root (root)
Date/Time : Sat 13 Nov 2010 07:57:24 PM CST
-Display-
Resolution : 1440x900 pixels
OpenGL Renderer : Unknown
X11 Vendor : The X.Org Foundation
-Multimedia-
Audio Adapter : VIA8233 - VIA 8235


Seems pretty solid so far.

EDIT:
Went ahead and grabbed the Nvidia driver....

# glxgears
3820 frames in 5.0 seconds = 764.000 FPS
6143 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1228.600 FPS
6081 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1216.200 FPS
6129 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1225.800 FPS
6089 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1217.800 FPS
17242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3448.400 FPS
16934 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3386.800 FPS
17078 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3415.600 FPS

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 02:22
by 01micko
James,

If you haven't rebooted, or boot again pfix=ram, try the video-upgrade again and post the contents of /tmp/petupgradevideo.sh.

At the top it should have "PET=$1". There is another file, /tmp/vuw_nvidia_pkg which I think has the driver name.. check that.

I'll test in a mo

Cheers

Ok, back and the nvidia driver is downloading fine for me.. unfortunately it will probably crash for me but that's ok, I have backup :wink:

Yes installs just fine, I know that because I get nvidia entry in the menu, but the driver crashes the system for me so I use the 260.* driver I posted in the drivers section.

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 02:49
by James C
01micko wrote:James,

If you haven't rebooted, or boot again pfix=ram, try the video-upgrade again and post the contents of /tmp/petupgradevideo.sh.

At the top it should have "PET=$1". There is another file, /tmp/vuw_nvidia_pkg which I think has the driver name.. check that.

I'll test in a mo

Cheers

Ok, back and the nvidia driver is downloading fine for me.. unfortunately it will probably crash for me but that's ok, I have backup :wink:

Yes installs just fine, I know that because I get nvidia entry in the menu, but the driver crashes the system for me so I use the 260.* driver I posted in the drivers section.

I'm on an Intel box now but video-upgrade won't download on it either.


PET="$1" #ex: xorg_upgrade_intel-2.10.0-w5.pet
cd /root
rxvt -bg yellow -e wget http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/dis ... wary5/$PET
petget /root/$PET
rm -f /root/$PET
PKGBASE="`basename $PET .pet`"
if [ ! -f /root/.packages/$PKGBASE.files ];then
xmessage -bg pink -center "Sorry, something went wrong, package is not installed"
fi


I'll boot up the Nvidia box pfix=ram in just a few minutes.

Wary 0.9.8 (098) feedback

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 02:50
by Billtoo
I'm running 098 from a 4gb flash drive.
I have sound but retrovol is still x'ed out so I change volume by using
the remote of my speaker system.
I used the ati pet, then exited to the prompt and entered "aticonfig
--initial" then "xwin" to get back to the desktop.Hardware acceleration
is working.
I'm afraid if I run the alsa sound wizard it will wreck the sound
altogether so I'm sticking with things the way they are...changed my
mind and ran it, got woof woof and still have sound but retrovol is
still x'ed out and doesn't work.
But this computer is new and Wary works *very* well on it :)
Thanks

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 03:30
by James C
01micko wrote:James,

If you haven't rebooted, or boot again pfix=ram, try the video-upgrade again and post the contents of /tmp/petupgradevideo.sh.

At the top it should have "PET=$1". There is another file, /tmp/vuw_nvidia_pkg which I think has the driver name.. check that.

I'll test in a mo

Cheers

Ok, back and the nvidia driver is downloading fine for me.. unfortunately it will probably crash for me but that's ok, I have backup :wink:

Yes installs just fine, I know that because I get nvidia entry in the menu, but the driver crashes the system for me so I use the 260.* driver I posted in the drivers section.
Back on the Nvidia box.pfix=ram.



petupgradevideo.sh
PET="$1" #ex: xorg_upgrade_intel-2.10.0-w5.pet
cd /root
rxvt -bg yellow -e wget http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/dis ... wary5/$PET
petget /root/$PET
rm -f /root/$PET
PKGBASE="`basename $PET .pet`"
if [ ! -f /root/.packages/$PKGBASE.files ];then
xmessage -bg pink -center "Sorry, something went wrong, package is not installed"
fi

/tmp/vuw_nvidia_pkg
nvidia-71.86.14-k2.6.31.14-w5.pet


Where did the Intel stuff come from?

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 03:42
by James C
Another fresh frugal install,this time on the old P3 test box.
Initial boot had sound and the correct 1024x768 screen resolution but no internet.Used SNS to get connection ....everything is persistent through several reboots.
Onboard Intel graphics,sound and nic.

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 03:50
by 01micko
Hmmm, weird James... that message from petget usually happens when there's a corrupt pet... did wget go through the motions at all? (Normally takes a couple of minutes for me, though I rarely get ibiblio any faster than 100k/s)

I grabbed the same pet when I debugged the vid-wiz last night in 097 on my old p3 with nvidia vanta card, it worked perfectly.

Cheers

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 03:57
by 01micko
Here's something many of us using desktops can't live without :lol:

numlockx

Compiled in Wary

Runs from /root/Startup

petspecs: numlockx-1.2-i486|numlockx|1.2-i486||BuildingBlock|36K||numlockx-1.2-i486.pet||turns on numlock at boot|puppy|wary5||

Cheers

NVIDIA driver 265 failed

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 04:03
by shinobar
Thanks the Warry-098.

Tried on my PC with NVIDIA Geforce 8800GTX.
First boot, nv or vesa i am not sure, got 1200x1048x24.
Installed nvidia-265 driver from the Video Upgrade Wizard.
Down to console, xorgwizard, chose nvidia, select 1200x1048x24, test.
After 'Test now', the PC freezes with black screen.

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 04:09
by James C
01micko wrote:Hmmm, weird James... that message from petget usually happens when there's a corrupt pet... did wget go through the motions at all? (Normally takes a couple of minutes for me, though I rarely get ibiblio any faster than 100k/s)

I grabbed the same pet when I debugged the vid-wiz last night in 097 on my old p3 with nvidia vanta card, it worked perfectly.

Cheers

I don't believe that wget did anything.Click the first button to download the pet and just a second or two later the install dialog pops up....no where near long enough to download the pet.

Downloaded the pet with the PPM and its working fine....GeForce 2 mx400.

Strange where the Intel line came from,no Intel anything on the box anywhere.Almost like it was trying to download the wrong pet,and it failed at that too.

PET="$1" #ex: xorg_upgrade_intel-2.10.0-w5.pet

Pupsave

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 04:10
by shinobar
Small issue:

Frugal install on sda3/wary. Boot up without pupsave.
At shutdown, offered to make pupsave.
The dialog appears to choose the partition, sda1 as the default whereas boot off from sda3.

I remember old woof did not show the dialog of partition choice in case booted off from some frugal installed partition.

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 04:14
by 01micko
James C wrote: Strange where the Intel line came from,no Intel anything on the box anywhere.Almost like it was trying to download the wrong pet,and it failed at that too.

PET="$1" #ex: xorg_upgrade_intel-2.10.0-w5.pet
"ex" means "example".. it's just a comment :wink: denoted by the hash symbol in bash

James.. I don't think that driver supports your card anyway, so maybe it was supposed to fail? :?
GeForce 3 series:
Ti, Ultra, GTS/Pro

GeForce 256 series:
256, 256 DDR

TNT / TNT2 series:
RIVA TNT2/TNT2 PRO, Aladdin TNT2, RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 Pro, RIVA TNT, RIVA TNT2 Ultra

Riva 128 PCI series:
Riva 128/128ZX

Riva 128 AGP series:
Riva 128 AGP

Vanta series:
Vanta/Vanta LT

Quadro 2 Pro series:
Quadro2 Pro
That's from the thread when I compiled nvidia-76.* for one of the other kernels Barry was using.

Re: NVIDIA driver 265 failed

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 04:17
by 01micko
shinobar wrote:Thanks the Warry-098.

Tried on my PC with NVIDIA Geforce 8800GTX.
First boot, nv or vesa i am not sure, got 1200x1048x24.
Installed nvidia-265 driver from the Video Upgrade Wizard.
Down to console, xorgwizard, chose nvidia, select 1200x1048x24, test.
After 'Test now', the PC freezes with black screen.
Same with me shino, you can try the one in the drivers thread I compiled in wary last week. Works for me. http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=61763

Cheers

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 04:25
by James C
01micko wrote:
James C wrote: Strange where the Intel line came from,no Intel anything on the box anywhere.Almost like it was trying to download the wrong pet,and it failed at that too.

PET="$1" #ex: xorg_upgrade_intel-2.10.0-w5.pet
"ex" means "example".. it's just a comment :wink: denoted by the hash symbol in bash

James.. I don't think that driver supports your card anyway, so maybe it was supposed to fail? :?
GeForce 3 series:
Ti, Ultra, GTS/Pro

GeForce 256 series:
256, 256 DDR

TNT / TNT2 series:
RIVA TNT2/TNT2 PRO, Aladdin TNT2, RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 Pro, RIVA TNT, RIVA TNT2 Ultra

Riva 128 PCI series:
Riva 128/128ZX

Riva 128 AGP series:
Riva 128 AGP

Vanta series:
Vanta/Vanta LT

Quadro 2 Pro series:
Quadro2 Pro
That's from the thread when I compiled nvidia-76.* for one of the other kernels Barry was using.
Well, it installed and it works.......pretty fair numbers for "glxgears".


17078 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3415.600 FPS

At least it didn't crash and burn.... :lol:

Re: NVIDIA driver 265 failed but 260 micko build works

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 05:29
by shinobar
01micko wrote:you can try the one in the drivers thread I compiled in wary last week. Works for me. http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=61763
Thanks micko. It works.
NVIDIA Geforce 8800GTX.

BTW, the secondlife viewer(1 nor 2) fails.
I have failed every version of Wary and Qirky.
Lucid is OK, Puppy-4.3.1(JPqs3) is OK.
I am not sure what library is missing or mismatching.

Re: Wary 0.9.8 (098) feedback

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 05:39
by BarryK
Billtoo wrote:I'm running 098 from a 4gb flash drive.
I have sound but retrovol is still x'ed out so I change volume by using
the remote of my speaker system.
I used the ati pet, then exited to the prompt and entered "aticonfig
--initial" then "xwin" to get back to the desktop.Hardware acceleration
is working.
I'm afraid if I run the alsa sound wizard it will wreck the sound
altogether so I'm sticking with things the way they are...changed my
mind and ran it, got woof woof and still have sound but retrovol is
still x'ed out and doesn't work.
But this computer is new and Wary works *very* well on it :)
Thanks
Billtoo,
Did you use the Video Upgrade Wizard to install the ATI PET? If so, it runs 'aticonfig --initial' after it installs, so you shouldn't have had to do that.

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 05:40
by 01micko
Barry

Something is wrong that I can't pinpoint to do with my acx device and ndiswrapper.

Yesterday in my sneaky testing on my P3 the thing just connected with no fuss.

Today in 098 it just refuses to connect, I even tried tempestuous' command line method. In Sns and network wizard I get no results in the scan. Usually there is about 7 or 8 access ponts detected by that card. I plugged in my usb tp-link dongle (rt73 device) and it connected with no fuss, albeit slowly (it's a distance thing, that's why I prefer the acx with an external antenna.)

As a sanity check I booted back into my sneaky installation and it was straight online with the acx device. So it's weird.. sns doesn't get far enough to catch a log, guess I'll try dmesg or something to look for clues, or look in the kernel log.

Anything change from yesterday that you can put your finger on?

Cheers

Re: NVIDIA driver 265 failed

Posted: Sun 14 Nov 2010, 05:43
by BarryK
shinobar wrote:Thanks the Warry-098.

Tried on my PC with NVIDIA Geforce 8800GTX.
First boot, nv or vesa i am not sure, got 1200x1048x24.
Installed nvidia-265 driver from the Video Upgrade Wizard.
Down to console, xorgwizard, chose nvidia, select 1200x1048x24, test.
After 'Test now', the PC freezes with black screen.
It seems that there is something wrong with the 256 nVidia PET -- 01micko also got a black screen. He has created a 260* PET, which is a more recent version that should support all the same cards, that works for him, so I will switch over to that.

01micko announced that on the 096 feedback thread.