I have never comprehended who would want folder icons that big. In the pup derivative I'd hoped to get the time to assemble, (which it's looking increasingly like I won't get to soon, hence I'm starting to pass my many strong opinions on to the forum..) my OotB settings for Rox would definitely be Small Icons, Detailed List view. Maybe I'm just not organized enough, having directories with scads and scads of files in them instead of super deep, subdivided levels of directory structure. Glad the setting of thumbnails-view got changed eventually-- my directories are usu. so full it takes awhile just to display them without the consarned thumbs.don570 wrote:
..and I now have given Puppy a central structure
to help users store their data neatly.
{image of rox window with the big honking folder icons}
And as for creating structure for us.. well suffice it to say, for my part, one of the 1st things I would do with my Winbloze machines was to rename the "My so-and-so" directories and definitely choose somewhere else to put stuff. Ever security-conscious, that surely was the 1st place intruders (corporations' software mostly I presume) would go to snoop on my bidness.
Just my $.02USD (worth less and less every day..)
Yes, we do want to get rid of them. I think they are information from mplayer that the frontend can use, for instance, as gnome-mplayer does to report on the percentage of cache fill.
