 |
Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com "THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in|
The time now is Wed 19 Jun 2013, 00:21 All times are UTC - 4 |
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Cutting edge |
|
Puppy 6
Moderators: Flash, Ian, JohnMurga |
 
|
View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic |
| Page 4 of 4 Posts_count | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| Author | Message | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mavrothal
 Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 1062 |
Puppy needs both! But what if the field engineers are actually designing without a blueprint, and the architects are designing as a goal and not as means to a high quality "product"? What about if the two do not communicate or at least have common end goals? The outcome will be (at best) an "one time good thing" that will stay within "a very little pond". More often than not, not even that. _________________ Kids all over the world go around with an XO laptop. They deserve one puppy (or many) too  |
||||||
|
|||||||
 |
|||||||
|
greengeek
Joined: 20 Jul 2010 Posts: 1217 Location: New Zealand |
What i love about this forum is that all points of view have an opportunity to contribute and shape new directions. The forum is like a backbone - it provides a strong central core but enabling offshoots. There are many offshoots of puppy and only time will tell which of those has the best overall structure and longevity. Or even which offshoots will not even be puppies at all. There is room for everything. At least the debates here offer a kind of "trial by fire" that subjects each version to wideranging scrutiny. I'm just thankful that the devs snd troubleshooters have vision and energy. |
||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
ICPUG
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 1278 Location: UK |
Iguleder is destined to be disappointed with Puppy! The Puppy development method does not allow for infrastructure and gradual progression from one version/port to the next. The Puppy development method is to: - find a developer that wants to do a specific version. - the developer then produces something while having as much fun as possible Any suggestion about putting order into the development process is usually shouted down as not being fun (which is probably true). I admire Iguleder's confidence in woof being the one true way and not looking at non-woof based puppies. He misses out on a lot of good ideas in my opinion. If you want infrastructure then you need to be with a distro like Debian, Red Hat or SUSE. Puppy development is chaotic. When a developer decides to build an ARM based Puppy it will be built. It probably will have tenuous links to any x86 Puppy but it will happen. |
||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
jemimah
 Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 4309 Location: Tampa, FL |
Yes it's absolutely true. There's nothing for it but to wait until the right people are at the same place at the same time. |
||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| Page 4 of 4 Posts_count | Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 |
|
|
View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic |
|
Forum index » Advanced Topics » Cutting edge |
Rules_post_cannot Rules_reply_cannot Rules_edit_cannot Rules_delete_cannot Rules_vote_cannot You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum |
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group