ICPUG
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 1278 Location: UK
Posted: Wed 16 Nov 2011, 09:23 Post subject:
Quote
I have not used Puppy before, in part because I felt no need considering the many distributions out there, and in part because some things like its ORIGINAL UBUNTU ROOTS did not appeal to me, but a Puppy based on my favorite Slackware needs to be checked out.
Unquote
The review is reasonable but the quote above (capitalisation mine) narked me off. Obviously a Slackware fan and anything else does not deserve consideration.
nooby
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 9479 Location: SwedenEurope
Posted: Wed 16 Nov 2011, 10:45 Post subject:
I know too little but this part
Quote:
like its ORIGINAL UBUNTU ROOTS
How known was Ubuntu when Barry Kauler started
making his first versions?
Edit hahah I was wrong 2003 he writes this
Quote:
22Dec03
Puppy version 0.7.9 is uploaded. The ISO file is 44.2M. Release notes:
* This version is still "Redhat based", meaning that Puppy requires a i686 class of CPU minimum.
So Red Hat and not Ubuntu. When did he favor Ubuntu?
2004 he writes
Quote:
The development environment used to compile Puppy applications is not another distro, but is a custom root filesystem put together by Erik Anderson, the main developer of uClibc (www.uclibc.org)
Did he not base it on Slax or Debian I should read up on
Puppy history but if Barry had been inspired by Ubuntu
then he had not allowed Puppy to be root ever
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum