When Puppy doesn't wow! - and when it does!
Posted: Thu 01 Dec 2011, 21:59
The great thing about Linux is the amount of choice!
I have an old (2009) AcerAspireOne with 8GB of SSD - no hard disk.
I have been experimenting with small Linux distros, from EasyPeasy to Puppy, via Xubuntu and others.
I liked the size of Puppy, but have stopped using it after problems with, primarily, the TouchPad (never worked properly) and miscellaneous screen problems.
I also found that the software update procedures were more complicated than the larger distros.
None of this is meant to run down Puppy! Far from it - it is certainly lean, but even 8GB (which exceeds the total capacity of an old Windows system I used to have) is enough to run a distro with more facilities, and dare I say, more elegance.
I am now using Mint, with both the Xfce desktop, and Gnome. I find both systems easy , and while not as fast to load as Puppy, quite acceptable.
In all distros I have a real problem with the size of available screen for some applications - setting up Thunderbird accounts is one of the worst; and Puppy had the same problem. I assume that Puppy works well on old desktop systems with full size screens but slow processors and limited memory.
Good luck to all.
Frank
I have an old (2009) AcerAspireOne with 8GB of SSD - no hard disk.
I have been experimenting with small Linux distros, from EasyPeasy to Puppy, via Xubuntu and others.
I liked the size of Puppy, but have stopped using it after problems with, primarily, the TouchPad (never worked properly) and miscellaneous screen problems.
I also found that the software update procedures were more complicated than the larger distros.
None of this is meant to run down Puppy! Far from it - it is certainly lean, but even 8GB (which exceeds the total capacity of an old Windows system I used to have) is enough to run a distro with more facilities, and dare I say, more elegance.
I am now using Mint, with both the Xfce desktop, and Gnome. I find both systems easy , and while not as fast to load as Puppy, quite acceptable.
In all distros I have a real problem with the size of available screen for some applications - setting up Thunderbird accounts is one of the worst; and Puppy had the same problem. I assume that Puppy works well on old desktop systems with full size screens but slow processors and limited memory.
Good luck to all.
Frank