I would love to be able to do this. Which brings me to my really newbie question...I told my HDD installation to take over /dev/hda2 and to leave my unformatted-win95(fat32) partition alone, which it did nicely. When I look at the partition in the DRIVES utility it is showing me a size of 1.9GB, and that it is using the ext2 file system; and when I try to "Resize my personal file" that utility says it doesn't exist with this installation.Nathan F wrote:I was thinking of a mod for this in some future derivative, how's this sound to you. Load usr_cram and image.gz into ram as normal, but have an option to mount an entire partition on /root rather than using a pupfile. Result=greatly increased personal storage size, with snappy ramdisk performance. Perfect solution for developers like myself who are always running out of room in pup001 from compiling apps.
Nathan
My confusion comes from reading this thread...am I using the entire 1.9GB or just a file on it? Also, using that same DRIVES utility it says that my /dev/hda1 partition is actually 4.4GB's, is formated ext2, and is unmounted. When I mount /dev/hda1, and it opens up in ROX, it appears to be a carbon copy of what I see when I open /dev/hda2. But, when I open /dev/hda in fdisk, it says that it is still a win95 partition with no formatting.... ...what is a boy to do? My origional intention in creating the two partions was to create a persistant filesystem that I can begin exploring more of Puppy with....like installing Java and Office at the same time as well as the Apache package, etc...
Just as an aside, I have felt a signifigant preformace loss since moving to the HDD installation. It flat just isn't as fast as running from RAM - never will be. I, to, think that loading the entire OS from the HDD into RAM upon startup and only accessing the HDD for data is the perfect solution that billy g. should have figured out a long time ago...imo.
Pyre