Page 1 of 1

FileZilla 3.53 (Built with Lucid 528-004)

Posted: Fri 02 Mar 2012, 19:51
by chrome307
Homepage:
http://filezilla-project.org/

Image

Features:
Easy to use
Supports FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)
Cross-platform. Runs on Windows, Linux, *BSD, Mac OS X and more
IPv6 support
Available in many languages
Supports resume and transfer of large files >4GB
Tabbed user interface
Powerful Site Manager and transfer queue
Bookmarks
Drag & drop support
Configurable transfer speed limits
Filename filters
Directory comparison
Network configuration wizard
Remote file editing
Keep-alive
HTTP/1.1, SOCKS5 and FTP-Proxy support
Logging to file
Synchronized directory browsing
Remote file search

Download (4mb English language only)

http://www.datafilehost.com/download-3c692328.html

Posted: Sat 03 Mar 2012, 14:38
by Terryphi
Good work, chrome307. Thanks. It was time I upgraded Filezilla. I am running it on Playdayz's latest Three Headed Dog.

Perhaps I should point out for others that it is not compatible with Wary/Racy 5.2.2 which lack some of the necessary libraries or versions.

Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 10:50
by chrome307
For non-English language support here are the locales:

2.3mb

http://www.datafilehost.com/download-d206b93c.html

Posted: Mon 05 Mar 2012, 11:53
by Terryphi
chrome307,

I have tested further. Filezilla works without problem run from the menu. If it is run from the terminal it works OK but produces this error message:

Code: Select all

# filezilla
Failed to connect to D-BUS: Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-bCs6u9E6A6: Connection refused
This error message is not produced running Filezilla 3.2.0 pet from the terminal.

Posted: Tue 06 Mar 2012, 13:55
by chrome307
Hi Terryphi

Thanks for the feedback, I'm not sure why you get this error ....... what are you attempting to do?

Posted: Tue 06 Mar 2012, 16:01
by Terryphi
chrome307 wrote:Hi Terryphi

Thanks for the feedback, I'm not sure why you get this error ....... what are you attempting to do?
Hi chrome307,

Good news: on subsequent boots the error does not appear. I have no idea what caused it on the first run.

Posted: Wed 07 Mar 2012, 17:01
by chrome307
Thank you again for reply and testing the software, it's great when you get some feedback.

Regards