PeasyScale uses a 32-bit binary called peasyscale.bin.edoc wrote:Anyhow, sorry to say it does not work in LightHouse64.
I have sent you a 64-bit version of PeasyScale to test.
WidthxHeight works perfectly in Precise 5.7.1 retro!rcrsn51 wrote:I have yet to get any feedback on the new WidthxHeight feature.
Code: Select all
jpegtran -rotate 90 -trim old.jpg > new.jpg
Played with this, and yes - definitely seems the better choice to (only possibly!) lose a few rows of pixels, than to have them transposed onto some other edge of the image, instead. Apparently, an unavoidable byproduct of 100% lossless transformations on images sized with some uneven multiple of block sizes... or something like that...rcrsn51 wrote: You can test this yourself with
Code: Select all
jpegtran -rotate 90 -trim old.jpg > new.jpg
My thoughts exactly.Moat wrote:Apparently, an unavoidable byproduct of 100% lossless transformations on images sized with some uneven multiple of block sizes... or something like that...
I have attached the new 64-bit version.edoc wrote:Will v. 1.8 work on a 64-bit Puppy?
I don't know what Gimp does. All that matters is the quality of the 800x600 image once it goes in the photo frame.Also, are the results I saw what you'd expect? The tiny new file size surprised me as when I reduce images manually, using GIMP, they are no where that small
Code: Select all
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"