Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Sat 25 Oct 2014, 18:28
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Derivatives
The journey to Archpup..
Moderators: Flash, JohnMurga
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
Page 5 of 6 Posts_count   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 11:18    Post_subject:  

stifiling wrote:
All the 'points' are being ignored. the best replies came from Q5sys. Like i said to the OP...before jrb posted an anger management website....

DID YOU POST OFF TOPIC IN THE FIRST POST OF YOUR OWN THEAD???

See if you can get that answered and not ignore it with some other useless post, or another old broken Arch Pup Link.

It pretty pointless anyway. Barry could murder a man around these parts...and it would still be defended.

"He sneezed and it accidentally went off."
"That guy walked in the way of the Gun."
"That guy tripped and fell and the bullet accidentally got him."


Posting from a working Arch Puppy from Feb 2009.......you two are looking like fools.Unless you can predate that....sorry for your damn bad luck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
stifiling

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 388

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 11:24    Post_subject:  

post the link to the iso. not a screenshot to an html file...

*you took that screenshot down fast* was something the matter with it?

and really...it's the OP that's looking more and more like the idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 11:32    Post_subject:  

stifiling wrote:
post the link to the iso. not a screenshot to an html file...

*you took that screenshot down fast* was something the matter with it?

and really...it's the OP that's looking more and more like the idiot.


Pretty damn obvious I'm posting from it now.....

You guys are a joke. Smile
for stifling.jpg
 Description   
 Filesize   67.12 KB
 Viewed   549 Time(s)

for stifling.jpg

Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 11:35    Post_subject:  

Code:
# free
              total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:      1035420       347008       688412            0        41604
 Swap:      1228932            0      1228932
Total:      2264352       347008      1917344
# uname -a
Linux puppypc 2.6.25.16 #1 Tue Aug 26 10:45:53 GMT-8 2008 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
#


Notice when the kernel was compiled.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
stifiling

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 388

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 11:47    Post_subject:  

James C wrote:
Code:
# free
              total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:      1035420       347008       688412            0        41604
 Swap:      1228932            0      1228932
Total:      2264352       347008      1917344
# uname -a
Linux puppypc 2.6.25.16 #1 Tue Aug 26 10:45:53 GMT-8 2008 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
#


Notice when the kernel was compiled.....


Guy...Guy........can u post the iso?

This boy pops out from behind the tree...with some old arch/puppy screenshot. as if the users haven't been requesting it for years. if you've got the iso, how come you didn't give it to puppyluvr months ago? what made you decide to dig that thing up now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 11:58    Post_subject:  

shuvvoff_b4iletuavit says that good things happen to those that wait.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 12:05    Post_subject:  

stifiling wrote:
if you've got the iso, how come you didn't give it to puppyluvr months ago?


That point actually deserves a serious answer.
With all of the constant changes to Woof, and there have been many changes, a build from an old Woof wouldn't have been much help.shuvvoff_b4iletuavit may weigh in further later.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
stifiling

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 388

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 12:10    Post_subject:  

James C wrote:
stifiling wrote:
if you've got the iso, how come you didn't give it to puppyluvr months ago?


That point actually deserves a serious answer.
With all of the constant changes to Woof, and there have been many changes, a build from an old Woof wouldn't have been much help.shuvvoff_b4iletuavit may weigh in further later.


that's not a good answer. when it comes to linux...everything helps. but yea, let's see if shuvvoff_b4iletuavit uploads the iso. and if it works, then yes "Arch Linux existed in Woof before simargl came along" will be valid. otherwise "But it didn't work" will be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 12:12    Post_subject:  

stifiling wrote:

This boy pops out from behind the tree...with some old arch/puppy screenshot.


Nobody's called me a boy for many,many years...... Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 12:15    Post_subject:  

stifiling wrote:
James C wrote:
stifiling wrote:
if you've got the iso, how come you didn't give it to puppyluvr months ago?


That point actually deserves a serious answer.
With all of the constant changes to Woof, and there have been many changes, a build from an old Woof wouldn't have been much help.shuvvoff_b4iletuavit may weigh in further later.


that's not a good answer. when it comes to linux...everything helps. but yea, let's see if shuvvoff_b4iletuavit uploads the iso. and if it works, then yes "Arch Linux existed in Woof before simargl came along" will be valid. otherwise "But it didn't work" will be.

It's being uploaded at the moment........since I was posting from it it apparently works. shuvvoff_b4iletuavit gave me permission to upload......so be patient.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 12:52    Post_subject:  

Courtesy of the famed developer .shuvvoff_b4iletuavit , the original Arch Puppy 007 ....vintage Feb. 2009 has been uploaded. A whole 105 mb download.

iso
http://www.smokey01.com/JamesC/Arch%20Puppy/apup-007.iso

md5
http://www.smokey01.com/JamesC/Arch%20Puppy/apup%20md5.txt

New thread for Arch Puppy 007
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=85020
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
James C


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 5867
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 12:54    Post_subject:  

stifiling wrote:
James C wrote:
stifiling wrote:
if you've got the iso, how come you didn't give it to puppyluvr months ago?


That point actually deserves a serious answer.
With all of the constant changes to Woof, and there have been many changes, a build from an old Woof wouldn't have been much help.shuvvoff_b4iletuavit may weigh in further later.


that's not a good answer. when it comes to linux...everything helps. but yea, let's see if shuvvoff_b4iletuavit uploads the iso. and if it works, then yes "Arch Linux existed in Woof before simargl came along" will be valid. otherwise "But it didn't work" will be.


The mere fact that Arch Puppy 007 exists and was produced in Feb. 2009 pretty well settles the matter.

Apologies to puppyluvr for the hijack of his thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
stifiling

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 388

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 13:31    Post_subject:  

James C wrote:
The mere fact that Arch Puppy 007 exists and was produced in Feb. 2009 pretty well settles the matter.


ok, so a working Arch Puppy has been woofed before.

So I would like to apologize to 'Barry' for accusing you of deliberately, or blatantly, or going out of your way to ignore the ArchPup threads.

Since you do have Arch Linux in Woof, that should have been 'obvious' that you had at least woofed it once to be sure it was working, otherwise it wouldn't have been there. I was overlooking that fact. So it was a misunderstanding and I should have thought about it more before I posted what I posted.

When you have such a high level of respect for someone, and you feel like you've been 'purposely' dissed by them....it makes you ask questions. But like I said, I see now that that was not the case.

Once again...my apologies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
stifiling

Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 388

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 13:35    Post_subject:  

James C wrote:
Apologies to puppyluvr for the hijack of his thread.


Well you didn't hijack his thread. I did. I'd like to apologize to puppyluvr for hijacking his thread.

What you did was gave him what he asked for 6 months ago. I'm sure if he had this iso a long time ago, he would have more than likely successfully gotten an Arch Puppy woofed.

If you go back and look at his posts, you'll see how 'vigorously' he was trying to get it to work. This iso would have helped out a lot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Chili Dog


Joined: 20 Dec 2011
Posts: 117

PostPosted: Fri 15 Mar 2013, 15:20    Post_subject:  

Now isn't that a turn of events!

But, respectfully, I would once again like to ask Mr. Kauler to include pacman, since simargl already found a way to do so, and many of us would really appreciate it.

I was going to suggest maybe an add-on pack would do the job, but simargl said attention to the base packages was given to ensure compatibility with pacman.
Back to top
View user's profile Send_private_message 
Display_posts:   Sort by:   
Page 5 of 6 Posts_count   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Post_new_topic   Reply_to_topic View_previous_topic :: View_next_topic
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Puppy Derivatives
Jump to:  

Rules_post_cannot
Rules_reply_cannot
Rules_edit_cannot
Rules_delete_cannot
Rules_vote_cannot
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0875s ][ Queries: 12 (0.0052s) ][ GZIP on ]