Page 1 of 2

Google Chrome 24.0.1312.57 .pet

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 00:00
by sheepy
Hi, everyone.
I made a pet package for Google Chrome 24.0.1312.57.
I have yet to find any bugs in it whatsoever, as opposed to the past versions of Google Chrome and Chromium.

Here is the pet: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-1cd3eb21.html

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 00:13
by Semme
Hi Sheepy.. Pup specific, or, she'll work for all current offerings?

I know :wink: you haven't tested, right? :lol:

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 00:20
by sheepy
Semme wrote:Hi Sheepy.. Pup specific, or, she'll work for all current offerings?

I know :wink: you haven't tested, right? :lol:
Nope, sure haven't! Hahaha.
But this should work with all puplets. I am pretty positive this is every dependency that would be needed.

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 00:24
by Semme
Good.. good to know. Thank you sir.

Pssst, usually just stick in /usr/lib and run it with that dopey :roll: user dir line..

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 00:34
by sheepy
Semme wrote:Good.. good to know. Thank you sir.

Pssst, usually just stick in /usr/lib and run it with that dopey :roll: user dir line..
Actually, it's installed in /opt/google/chrome. I made the package from the official Debian package and changed hex value of /opt/google/chrome/chrome. :)

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 00:59
by Semme
Well, it's fine that you offer this pre-pkg'd pet. As for myself, I prefer manual installs..

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 01:07
by sheepy
Semme wrote:Well, it's fine that you offer this pre-pkg'd pet. As for myself, I prefer manual installs..
I know the feeling. xD
Although with some pets dependency hunting can be a hassle!
Chromium goes in /usr/lib/ like many other pets, but Google products (Google Talk, Chrome, etc.) go in /opt/google. Pretty strange spot, isn't it? The latest Google Chrome package comes with all dependencies, which is why it is so large. Even has its own built-in media player (some versions of Chromium had super buggy media players).

Posted: Mon 04 Feb 2013, 16:39
by afishe2000
Sorry the .pet didn't work for me...

The .pet installed the package to a directory /google-chrome 24.0.1312.57 and not to /etc, /opt. and /usr.

Slacko 5.3.3

Posted: Tue 05 Feb 2013, 20:18
by sheepy
afishe2000 wrote:Sorry the .pet didn't work for me...

The .pet installed the package to a directory /google-chrome 24.0.1312.57 and not to /etc, /opt. and /usr.

Slacko 5.3.3
Leave it to sheepy to accidentally package the wrong directory. T__T
I updated the link in the post.
Thank you for catching that! lol

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 14:20
by rmcellig
I'm running Racy 5.5. I installed Google Chrome from the link in your initial post. The Puppy Package Manager says it is installed but I can't find it under Internet or in the usr/share/applications directory. Where can I locate a copy that will work in Racy 5.5. Same goes for Firefox. The repos have old versions of Firefox.

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 18:26
by Semme
FF's *where* in Racy.. /usr/lib?

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 18:37
by rmcellig
Yes. I see a firefox-4.0.1 directory in there. When I do an about on it it says Tumucumaque Minefield. I was looking for the latest ff which I think is now up to 19. and Google Chrome 24?

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 19:27
by Semme
If you wanna continue with FF, confirm you're willing to play guinea pig. Chrome's a whole'nother ball game.

*Slow response.. I'm take'n this as a no. Quite OK. You can't expect me or anyone else to do all the legwork.

*No response means >> you didn't like what I had to say. Understood. My response- I wish you the best.

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 20:40
by rmcellig
It's on my test laptop so why not. I'm game! Let's do it!

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 21:01
by Semme
Rename both /usr/lib/firefox and ~/.mozilla/firefox by placing a *1* in front of each.

Dwnld the latest tarball and extract to the same.. /usr/lib.

Menu stuff should remain intact. She fire?

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 21:20
by rmcellig
No. It doesn't launch.

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 21:24
by Semme
There's an FF folder IN your FF folder.. HOW SO?

You extract to /usr/lib or /urs/lib/firefox?

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 21:41
by rmcellig
Semme wrote:There's an FF folder IN your FF folder.. HOW SO?

You extract to /usr/lib or /urs/lib/firefox?
I extracted to /urs/lib/firefox

I will start over again, and this time extract to /usr/lib

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 21:44
by Semme
Yep! That'll do what we want >> overwrite <almost> everything.

Posted: Thu 07 Mar 2013, 21:50
by Semme
Yer :lol: slow.. C'mon Randy- get down wid'it..