Newer Gnumeric available
Posted: Sun 17 Feb 2013, 15:05
The newest stable version of Gnumeric is 1.12.0 - see http://projects.gnome.org/gnumeric/ for details.
READ-ONLY Archive
https://oldforum.puppylinux.com/
Could someone make a pet for this to work in current version of Slacko?Jades wrote:The newest stable version of Gnumeric is 1.12.0 - see http://projects.gnome.org/gnumeric/ for details.
I have a problem getting them to load via the boot manager....as a sanity check, I look in /etc/rc.d/BOOTCONFIG to see what is set to set to be loaded at boot.Jades wrote:Has anyone else had any problems with unloading SFS files via SFS_Load that you get to through the Setup app's Install tab?
Code: Select all
[ $KERNELMAJORVER -eq 32 ] && DISSOSIATE="false" && debug "'losetup -d' is disabled. for kernel-3.2.x"
vattery, I'll make a package soonally wrote:hey micko
successfully installed 5.4.0.3 to a trouble acer 8935g, first problem encountered is a lack of battery monitor - advice please....
regards
3.4.17-PAE (Slacko 5.4.03 and CPU is Pentium D 3.4.GHz).SFR wrote:RE: sfs unload problem
To everyone who have encountered the issue - which kernel version you use?
I tried a similar procedure with a JRE SFS originally downloaded from this forum. I ended up at the screen shown on the attached image. CTRL-ALT-F2 didn't do anything and I had to hit the reset button.SFR wrote:Here's procedure which reproduces sfs_load hang every time (at least for me) and the symptoms are: a) SFS_load hangs on "Processing... Wait a moment..." window; b) inability to shut down the system.
1. Load devx.sfs
2. Reboot
3. Unload devx.sfs -> hang
Code: Select all
[ $KERNELMAJORVER -ge 32 ] && DISSOSIATE="false" && debug "'losetup -d' is disabled. for kernel-3.2.x"
Code: Select all
# free
total used free shared buffers
Mem: 253280 237152 16128 0 22464
-/+ buffers: 214688 38592
Swap: 1020092 6300 1013792
#
This is an interesting comment. Having swap, you've done a good thing is protecting that your system wouldn't quickly lock as you increase system workload. But I am curious because of an observation I've made about 32bit PUPs I/O subsystem usage when running "pfix=RAM".James C wrote:No wonder it's slower, using swap with just the browser open.........
Code: Select all
swapoff /dev/...
Try this pet of pemasu's .. http://www.smokey01.com/pemasu/pet_pack ... -0.0.1.petally wrote:...first problem encountered is a lack of battery monitor - advice please....