?woof-code x86-64 anyone?

Under development: PCMCIA, wireless, etc.
Post Reply
Message
Author
scsijon
Posts: 1596
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007, 03:59
Location: the australian mallee
Contact:

?woof-code x86-64 anyone?

#1 Post by scsijon »

Before I start to assemble a set, has anyone already created a set of woof2 woofx/woof-code/* files.
Maybe not the latest, but ones I can work from, to build a 64bit Puppy rather than start from scratch.

thanks

jamesbond
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007, 05:02
Location: The Blue Marble

#2 Post by jamesbond »

Not us. It would be good to have a pure-breed 64-bit puppy :)
Fatdog64 forum links: [url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Latest version[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/ke8sn5H]Contributed packages[/url] | [url=https://cutt.ly/se8scrb]ISO builder[/url]

User avatar
Iguleder
Posts: 2026
Joined: Tue 11 Aug 2009, 09:36
Location: Israel, somewhere in the beautiful desert
Contact:

#3 Post by Iguleder »

I say adapting Woof to build x86_64 puppies is a bad idea, because we'll have to do this hacky procedure again for ARMv7, AArch64 and any other architecture.

Having a plug-in interface is the way to go, IMHO.
[url=http://dimakrasner.com/]My homepage[/url]
[url=https://github.com/dimkr]My GitHub profile[/url]

scsijon
Posts: 1596
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007, 03:59
Location: the australian mallee
Contact:

#4 Post by scsijon »

Iguleder wrote:Having a plug-in interface is the way to go, IMHO.
Would you care to expand on that (please), as i'm not sure what you mean, but i'm quite willing to consider anything at this early stage.

User avatar
Karl Godt
Posts: 4199
Joined: Sun 20 Jun 2010, 13:52
Location: Kiel,Germany

#5 Post by Karl Godt »

Plugin interface might be a ${PUPXXXSFS%\.*}_64bit_lib.sfs , I think , PLUS an adrive_64bit.sfs ..

Would like to try it with sfs_load while already up and running as 32bit :D

Post Reply