MPlayer - With GUI

Audio editors, music players, video players, burning software, etc.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
OscarTalks
Posts: 2196
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2012, 00:58
Location: London, England

#16 Post by OscarTalks »

8Geee wrote:UPDATE: I D/L this and wow :shock: a 20Mb binary (gnome-mplayer = 5Mb) plus a lot of docs and foreign language. If you need it, go for it, if you don't older equipment may do better just where you're at. Next up... ffmpeg patch.
I take it you are talking about the Slackware update packages here?

You are certainly correct to say that the user should consider what is best for them, depending on what tasks they wish to perform.

Just to clarify a couple of points though, my gnome-mplayer package for Slacko is around 625k unpacked, There is a separate NLS package which is a little larger but optional of course. Gnome-mplayer is just a front end which depends on your mplayer binary (be it old or new). My gnome-mplayer is 1.0.9 which should be effectively a version upgrade in most (if not all) Pups.

My mplayer (gmplayer) packages do not contain any DOC or NLS stuff, but the binary is BIG compared to the old originals as I mentioned before. As you said, it is up to the user to decide. I believe much of the size is due to it containing statically linked ffmpeg libraries (the default build configuration), but because these are the latest they give all the increased functionality such as new codecs to play formats such as HEVC / H265 and VP9.

It is possible to compile mplayer against your existing system ffmpeg libraries. This will make the binary smaller but restrict you to the functionality of these. Some of the newer formats won't play. In the case of Precise and Wheezy you have a fairly old libav package in place of ffmpeg. Slackos have ffmpeg but never as recent as the latest. Sometimes, size does matter.
Oscar in England
Image

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#17 Post by musher0 »

OscarTalks wrote:Hello musher0,

I did a test download from http://smokey01.com/OscarTalks and unpacked with UExtract 3.16 and it all seemed OK to me here.

Anyway, as a precaution I have re-created the .pet and uploaded again.
MD5sum = bb8ebb78dbf44b89a15c3dfddc34ac87
mplayer-1.2.1-wheezy.pet

I have also compiled the latest SVN snapshot which is even more recent than the release of course.
Thanks.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

User avatar
OscarTalks
Posts: 2196
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2012, 00:58
Location: London, England

#18 Post by OscarTalks »

I have compiled SVN snapshot 37905 in various Puppies including Wary 5.5
This is the latest as of early December 2016, more recent than any of the releases and includes bleeding edge ffmpeg for optimum codec support. See first post.
Oscar in England
Image

User avatar
jrb
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue 11 Dec 2007, 19:56
Location: Smithers, BC, Canada

#19 Post by jrb »

Just downloaded and installed your http://smokey01.com/OscarTalks/mplayer- ... recise.pet, http://smokey01.com/OscarTalks/smplayer ... recise.pet and http://smokey01.com/OscarTalks/gnome-mp ... recise.pet in Precise-light. They all work perfectly. As is so often the case the ubuntu downloads through PPM were a hopeless bloated morass of dependencies which ended up not working while yours were a third the size and required nothing but installation. Excellent work. :D

Thank you very much, J

Post Reply