Page 1 of 1

A new (perfect) 3.17.0 kernel for Puppy

Posted: Fri 07 Nov 2014, 22:58
by exton
I don't know how useful this info is for the average Puppy Linux user is, but today I have compiled a new perfect (as I think) 3.17.0 kernel for my PuppEX installed (not "frugal") system. I call it 3.17.0-puppex.

The kernel can be used in all newer 32 bit Puppy Linux "fully" installed systems. I.e. not "frugal" systems.

DOWNLOAD (puppy-k317.zip)
md5sum

1. unzip puppy-k317.zip
2. Place vmlinuz in /boot
3. Create new folders 3.17.0-puppex and all-firmware in /lib/modules
4. Open the sfs files and copy the content to the folders 3.17.0-puppex respectively all-firmware
Done!

Posted: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 00:01
by starhawk
If it doesn't work on frugals, I wouldn't quite call it perfect.

...but that's just me ;) not my kernel, not my final determination as to how perfect it is or is not.

Posted: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 00:21
by puppyluvr
:D Hello,
why only full installs?
no aufs patches?

Posted: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 02:47
by James C
Since I do use full installs I'll give it a try.

Thanks. :)

Posted: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 09:55
by exton
puppyluvr wrote::D Hello,
why only full installs?
no aufs patches?
The kernel is indeed patched with aufs.

And it is "perfect" for fully installed Puppy systems.

Posted: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 10:09
by mikeb
I assume the reason is that there is nothing done about the initrd...a user would have to alter that for frugal use that's all as for any kernel change.

And there are still patches for aufs?!!!

Perhaps list a few of the perfections to give an idea of whats improved/added.

mike

Posted: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 10:17
by exton
mikeb wrote:I assume the reason is that there is nothing done about the initrd...a user would have to alter that for frugal use that's all as for any kernel change.

And there are still patches for aufs?!!!

Perhaps list a few of the perfections to give an idea of whats improved/added.

mike
As I said in my first post the kernel is for "fully" installed systems.

Posted: Sat 08 Nov 2014, 10:20
by mikeb
I was merely pointing out to those who wondered why this was so...and if someone wanted to they could use it for a frugal.

But I see that its getting dizzy up there so bye for now :D

mike

Posted: Mon 10 Nov 2014, 01:28
by MinHundHettePerro
Arne,
is the .config-file included in your package?

Cheers /MHHP

Posted: Mon 10 Nov 2014, 11:23
by exton
MinHundHettePerro wrote:Arne,
is the .config-file included in your package?
No, but I can/will add it as an attachment here later today.

Posted: Mon 10 Nov 2014, 11:36
by mavrothal
exton wrote:
MinHundHettePerro wrote:Arne,
is the .config-file included in your package?
No, but I can/will add it as an attachment here later today.
if you configure it with CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=yes then the config file is included in /proc/config.gz (general setup --> Kernel .config support, Enable access to .config through /proc/config.gz)

Posted: Mon 10 Nov 2014, 12:37
by exton
mavrothal wrote:
exton wrote:
MinHundHettePerro wrote:Arne,
is the .config-file included in your package?
No, but I can/will add it as an attachment here later today.
if you configure it with CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=yes then the config file is included in /proc/config.gz (general setup --> Kernel .config support, Enable access to .config through /proc/config.gz)
Ok. Hope it works, because I can't attach the config file here. I keep getting the error message "extension not allowed". (???).

Posted: Mon 10 Nov 2014, 15:11
by mavrothal
exton wrote: Ok. Hope it works, because I can't attach the config file here. I keep getting the error message "extension not allowed". (???).
What is the extension?
The best is to just gzip it and attache it.
'.gz' is an accepted extension. .'txt' is not.

Posted: Mon 10 Nov 2014, 19:12
by exton
mavrothal wrote:
exton wrote: Ok. Hope it works, because I can't attach the config file here. I keep getting the error message "extension not allowed". (???).
What is the extension?
The best is to just gzip it and attache it.
'.gz' is an accepted extension. .'txt' is not.
Got it. Here it is then - see encl.

Posted: Mon 10 Nov 2014, 22:57
by MinHundHettePerro
exton wrote:Got it. Here it is then - see encl.
Thanks! /MHHP

Posted: Wed 12 Nov 2014, 02:38
by puppyluvr
:D Hello,
Again I ask, why perfect for full installs?
Please share why that is..