Puppy Linux Discussion Forum Forum Index Puppy Linux Discussion Forum
Puppy HOME page : puppylinux.com
"THE" alternative forum : puppylinux.info
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Thu 19 Oct 2017, 14:26
All times are UTC - 4
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Cutting edge
kernel compiling in woof-ce
Moderators: Flash, Ian, JohnMurga
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 29 of 32 [467 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 Next
Author Message
stemsee

Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 1978
Location: In The Way

PostPosted: Wed 31 Aug 2016, 06:25    Post subject:  

Runs on Debian/Ubuntu system and builds image/initrd and kernel/modules/headers official .deb packages after installing required build packages (fakeroot etc). Only builds one arch/run at the moment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
stemsee

Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 1978
Location: In The Way

PostPosted: Thu 15 Sep 2016, 13:58    Post subject:  

removed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
friTTe


Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 31
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Mon 26 Sep 2016, 20:12    Post subject:  

DR.TUX wrote:
This is my first post:
Using stemsee's "2016 SUKK i've compiled 64 bit 4.4.6 quirky/puppy linux kernel with x32abi support

kernel is compiled for and tested in Bary Kauler's 'prototype" aprilneo-7.1.93 x32abi system (everything seems works fine)
in others 64 bit puppies xorgwizard doesn't work
Here is link to 4.4.6-x86_64_x32abi kernel package and sources:

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByPXYY0edx2-bmFiSzBmYUxaaVU&usp=sharing


Been searching all night for somthing like this, i can report that it works like a charm on X-Thar



And this one is a LTS if im not wrong?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
sc0ttman


Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 2532
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed 26 Oct 2016, 18:01    Post subject:  

Is it yet possible to build a puppy that has no X and uses the framebuffer device (/dev/fb0) out of the box?

I would like a console only/headless puppy (no X, no Xorg, no xvesa), that can play videos etc on the console ....

The most recent puppy that has high-res framebuffer support out of the box is still Akita :/ and that is well old ...

_________________
Akita Linux, VLC-GTK, Pup Search, Pup File Search

Last edited by sc0ttman on Sun 30 Oct 2016, 08:49; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Keef


Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 864
Location: Staffordshire

PostPosted: Sat 29 Oct 2016, 13:58    Post subject:  

How ya doing Scott!!

I've just exited to the console on TahrPup and have been running an mp4 video via mplayer. Needs the video driver set as fbdev2 eg: "mplayer -vo fbdev2 somevideo.mp4".
Can't get full screen (yet), but plays well enough.
It's been quite a while since I've played around with framebuffer stuff, but I fancy a dabble again now.

See here http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/15738/kernel-mode-setting-vs-framebuffer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
sc0ttman


Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 2532
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun 30 Oct 2016, 08:24    Post subject:  

Keef wrote:
How ya doing Scott!!

I've just exited to the console on TahrPup and have been running an mp4 video via mplayer. Needs the video driver set as fbdev2 eg: "mplayer -vo fbdev2 somevideo.mp4".
Can't get full screen (yet), but plays well enough.
It's been quite a while since I've played around with framebuffer stuff, but I fancy a dabble again now.

See here http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/15738/kernel-mode-setting-vs-framebuffer

How u doing mate, alright? Long time no see...

Hmmm .. Will have to try that again ... Last I checked, I couldn't make anything work in framebuffer on tahr... but that was ages ago .. will have to try it out again...

Still seems strange to me that puppy doesnt have a 'headless' flavour/puplet with each release, being a lightweight distro n all .. maybe cos ppm still doesn't work as cli tool?

after discovering the 'ranger' file manager, i find i rarely "need" X at all ..

but cheers, i will check it out

_________________
Akita Linux, VLC-GTK, Pup Search, Pup File Search
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
jamesbond

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 3055
Location: The Blue Marble

PostPosted: Sun 30 Oct 2016, 23:01    Post subject:  

@scottman - what do you need framebuffer for? As far as I know, all recent puppies come with framebuffer support nowadays (comes for free with KMS-enabled kernel, and with fbcon built-in already).
_________________
Fatdog64, Slacko and Puppeee user. Puppy user since 2.13.
Contributed Fatdog64 packages thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
sc0ttman


Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 2532
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed 02 Nov 2016, 07:50    Post subject:  

jamesbond wrote:
@scottman - what do you need framebuffer for? As far as I know, all recent puppies come with framebuffer support nowadays (comes for free with KMS-enabled kernel, and with fbcon built-in already).

yes i realised that after i fixed a few thing on my netbooks xfce tahr puplet ... Embarassed Embarassed .. just me being dumb!

(dont wanna derail the thread with my ignorance, but on a side note, IMVHO puppy would be so much more awesome if it had a cli package manager .. or am i gonna find out that it does now? lol ... )

_________________
Akita Linux, VLC-GTK, Pup Search, Pup File Search
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
jlst

Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Posts: 571

PostPosted: Thu 03 Nov 2016, 11:42    Post subject:  

sc0ttman wrote:
jamesbond wrote:
@scottman - what do you need framebuffer for? As far as I know, all recent puppies come with framebuffer support nowadays (comes for free with KMS-enabled kernel, and with fbcon built-in already).

yes i realised that after i fixed a few thing on my netbooks xfce tahr puplet ... Embarassed Embarassed .. just me being dumb!

(dont wanna derail the thread with my ignorance, but on a side note, IMVHO puppy would be so much more awesome if it had a cli package manager .. or am i gonna find out that it does now? lol ... )

It may happen, but it's not implemented yet, that requires a rewrite...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Gobbi

Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Mon 16 Jan 2017, 12:19    Post subject:  

Using SUKK-June-2016 and the DOTconfig file from Fatdog64-710 (k 4.4.35) I compiled only the x86_64 of 4.9.4 kernel .
As seen in the picture , the /sys folder icon has a tag which belongs to " Extended attributes " ( 'Extended attributes' is in the right-click menu ) . Those two attributes - system.posix_acl_access and system.posix_acl_default - just stand there and I could do nothing about them : one can not remove any of them as the button would suggest . Everything inside /sys behaves the same way .
I did not choose the POSIX extended attributes ACL for any filesystems from menuconfig (no modules or built in) - I left the DOTconfig file the way it was initially . Should this be an evolution of linux kernel or something went wrong ?

Edit 1 : I think ACL is already in Fatdog64 710 with k 4.4.35 as seen in /etc/mke2fs.conf file . Only that this tag on /sys folder - and its content - was not present . Access Control List is about rights and permissions of files , folders - objects in general .
Edit 2 : I found that one could give up using 'Extended attributes ' . By checking the box in Rox (right-click in any free space inside a folder) -Optins-Compatibility-Don't use extended attributes .
However I don't know all the consequences of this action .By default that box is unchecked .
screenshot.png
 Description   screenshot
 Filesize   233.86 KB
 Viewed   549 Time(s)

screenshot.png

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
mistfire

Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 608
Location: PH

PostPosted: Thu 23 Feb 2017, 03:44    Post subject:  

stemsee wrote:
4.7.1-64 huge package

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_gaN1QXLwtkTTdHVDNZa19oOEk

sorces
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_gaN1QXLwtkWWZPR0ZtUHRKOGM

4.7.1-pae
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_gaN1QXLwtkSmoxVzZ5M1I2eFk

sources
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_gaN1QXLwtkeVNQdXAtRFhKLVU

4.7.1-nopae
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B_gaN1QXLwtkN3ZhS2lPZUk2THM

sources
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_gaN1QXLwtkMkFMeFBwemxCZEU


zram kernel module is missing on these version
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
stemsee

Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 1978
Location: In The Way

PostPosted: Thu 23 Feb 2017, 11:50    Post subject:  

You could simply compile that module from within sukk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
mistfire

Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 608
Location: PH

PostPosted: Thu 23 Feb 2017, 21:06    Post subject:  

@stemsee can you please provide a precompiled zram for that version? I have no experience on compiling from source.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Sailor Enceladus

Joined: 22 Feb 2016
Posts: 1250

PostPosted: Fri 24 Feb 2017, 02:12    Post subject:  

mistfire wrote:
@stemsee can you please provide a precompiled zram for that version? I have no experience on compiling from source.

It's a good thing to start learning. Do you know where to find the devx file for your distro? You will need to click on that sfs and probably the kernel sources to load them, then it's usually just ./configure then make ba da boom ba da bing... or however "sukk" does it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
stemsee

Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 1978
Location: In The Way

PostPosted: Thu 09 Mar 2017, 08:26    Post subject:  

I would like to add another option to sukk, namely the ability to compile broadcom modules. I have not successfully done this yet. Help needed.

Currently my laptop has the broadcom chip and only the fatdog kernel 4.7.1 has the module and the fd system has the bc service to load the module. I wonder if James or Kirk would provide a how to with the required environment for building the brcm modules!

Cheers
stemsee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 29 of 32 [467 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Advanced Topics » Cutting edge
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0846s ][ Queries: 14 (0.0132s) ][ GZIP on ]