Joined: 18 May 2008 Posts: 4851 Location: Blue Springs, MO
Posted: Fri 15 Jan 2016, 01:43 Post subject:
Ted Dog wrote:
should have the guy that moved C to C++ should have been included ( may have, been listed but uncredited ) They did leave BK out and I think he belongs as well as developer of Knoppix. They both added a lot to present day uses of linux.
Bjarne Strousup and Klaus Knopper... I agree about Klaus, though I'm not a big fan of C++ in part because of some of Bjarne's design decisions, but many C++ devs would disagree and other language fans would choose their own champions. _________________ Check out my github repositories. I may eventually get around to updating my blogspot.
Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 4013 Location: Heart of Texas
Posted: Fri 15 Jan 2016, 03:56 Post subject:
Lol I would not choose c++ if given the choice. Paid to write or better extended a c++ program that was around 25 K lines of code. However moving C from a slight improvement of its machine language like start to C++ I consider a nearly impossible task. After becoming a c++ expert in a short time I came to like how the orginal coder designed it. He left to work on Visual Basic project Sadly he left the company for good and left a VB nightmare for me to inherent. Which turned me into a reluctant Visual Basic coder, It was a wild ride to move between IBM rexx and small talk coder on OS/2 to C++ then VB for the same company.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum